首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neuroscience >Glycolysis Paradigm Shift Dictates a Reevaluation of Glucose and Oxygen Metabolic Rates of Activated Neural Tissue
【2h】

Glycolysis Paradigm Shift Dictates a Reevaluation of Glucose and Oxygen Metabolic Rates of Activated Neural Tissue

机译:糖酵解范式转移决定了活化神经组织的葡萄糖和氧气代谢率的重新评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In 1988 two seminal studies were published, both instigating controversy. One concluded that “the energy needs of activated neural tissue are minimal, being fulfilled via the glycolytic pathway alone,” a conclusion based on the observation that neural activation increased glucose consumption, which was not accompanied by a corresponding increase in oxygen consumption (). The second demonstrated that neural tissue function can be supported exclusively by lactate as the energy substrate (). While both studies continue to have their supporters and detractors, the present review attempts to clarify the issues responsible for the persistence of the controversies they have provoked and offer a possible rationalization. The concept that lactate rather than pyruvate, is the glycolytic end-product, both aerobically and anaerobically, and thus the real mitochondrial oxidative substrate, has gained a greater acceptance over the years. The idea of glycolysis as the sole ATP supplier for neural activation (glucose → lactate + 2ATP) continues to be controversial. Lactate oxidative utilization by activated neural tissue could explain the mismatch between glucose and oxygen consumption and resolve the existing disagreements among users of imaging methods to measure the metabolic rates of the two energy metabolic substrates. The postulate that the energy necessary for active neural tissue is supplied by glycolysis alone stems from the original aerobic glycolysis paradigm. Accordingly, glucose consumption is accompanied by oxygen consumption at 1–6 ratio. Since observed only a minimal if non-existent oxygen consumption compared to glucose consumption, their conclusion make sense. Nevertheless, considering (a) the shift in the paradigm of glycolysis (glucose → lactate; lactate + O2 + mitochondria → pyruvate → TCA cycle → CO2 + H2O + 17ATP); (b) that one mole of lactate oxidation requires only 50% of the amount of oxygen necessary for the oxidation of one mole of glucose; and (c) that lactate, as a mitochondrial substrate, is over eight times more efficient at ATP production than glucose as a glycolytic substrate, suggest that future studies of cerebral metabolic rates of activated neural tissue should include along with the measurements of CMRO2 and CMRglucose the measurement of CMRlactate.
机译:1988年,发表了两项具有开创性的研究,均引发了争议。一个结论是“被激活的神经组织的能量需求最小,仅通过糖酵解途径就可以满足”,这一结论是基于以下观察结果的:神经激活增加了葡萄糖消耗,而葡萄糖消耗却没有相应增加。第二个结果表明,神经组织功能只能由乳酸作为能量底物来支持。尽管这两项研究都继续有其支持者和批评者,但本次审查试图澄清造成他们所引起的争议持续存在的问题,并提出合理化的可能。多年来,乳酸而不是丙酮酸是需氧和厌氧的糖酵解终产物,因此是真正的线粒体氧化底物,这一概念已得到越来越多的接受。糖酵解作为神经激活的唯一ATP供应者(葡萄糖→乳酸+ 2ATP)的想法仍然存在争议。活化的神经组织对乳酸的氧化利用可以解释葡萄糖和氧气消耗之间的不匹配,并解决了使用成像方法测量两种能量代谢底物的代谢率之间存在的分歧。假设仅由糖酵解提供活动神经组织所需的能量,就源于原始的有氧糖酵解范例。因此,葡萄糖消耗与氧气消耗的比率为1-6。由于观察到的氧气消耗量与葡萄糖消耗量相比只有很小的差异,因此得出的结论是有意义的。然而,考虑(a)糖酵解范式的转变(葡萄糖→乳酸;乳酸+ O2 +线粒体→丙酮酸→TCA循环→CO2 + H2O + 17ATP); (b)一摩尔乳酸的氧化仅需要氧化一摩尔葡萄糖所需的氧气量的50%; (c)乳酸作为线粒体底物,在ATP产生方面的效率比葡萄糖作为糖酵解底物的效率高八倍,这表明未来关于活化神经组织的脑代谢率的研究应包括对CMRO2和CMR葡萄糖的测量CMR乳酸盐的测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号