首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Infection Prevention >Outbreak Column 16: Cognitive errors in outbreak decision making
【2h】

Outbreak Column 16: Cognitive errors in outbreak decision making

机译:爆发专栏16:爆发决策中的认知错误

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

During outbreaks, decisions must be made without all the required information. People, including infection prevention and control teams (IPCTs), who have to make decisions during uncertainty use heuristics to fill the missing data gaps. Heuristics are mental model short cuts that by-and-large enable us to make good decisions quickly. However, these heuristics contain biases and effects that at times lead to cognitive (thinking) errors. These cognitive errors are not made to deliberately misrepresent any given situation; we are subject to heuristic biases when we are trying to perform optimally. The science of decision making is large; there are over 100 different biases recognised and described. Outbreak Column 16 discusses and relates these heuristics and biases to decision making during outbreak prevention, preparedness and management. Insights as to how we might recognise and avoid them are offered.
机译:在爆发期间,必须在没有所有必需信息的情况下做出决策。必须在不确定性期间做出决定的人员(包括感染预防和控制团队(IPCT))使用启发式方法来填补缺失的数据空白。启发式方法是心理模型的捷径,总的来说,它使我们能够快速做出明智的决定。但是,这些启发式方法包含偏见和影响,有时会导致认知(思维)错误。这些认知错误不会故意歪曲任何给定的情况;当我们尝试最佳表现时,我们会受到启发式偏见的影响。决策的科学性很强;有超过100种不同的偏见得到认可和描述。爆发专栏16讨论了这些启发式方法和偏见,并将其与爆发预防,准备和管理过程中的决策相关联。提供了有关我们如何识别和避免它们的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号