首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >THE GERIATRIC ANXIETY SCALE AND THE GERIATRIC ANXIETY INVENTORY: RELATIONSHIPS TO ANXIETY RISK FACTORS
【2h】

THE GERIATRIC ANXIETY SCALE AND THE GERIATRIC ANXIETY INVENTORY: RELATIONSHIPS TO ANXIETY RISK FACTORS

机译:老年焦虑量表和老年焦虑量表:与焦虑风险因素的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Anxiety in later life is a major clinical problem, with notable barriers to accurate assessment. The Geriatric Anxiety Scale (GAS) and Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) represent two elder-specific assessment tools that have recently been developed and validated. This study aimed to examine the convergent validity of both measures as they relate to known risk factors for anxiety and to directly compare the measures. Community-dwelling older adults completed the GAS, GAI, and four measures that cover three anxiety risk factors: the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS), the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), and the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3). Correlations were computed between the GAS and the GAI with the risk factors. Results showed that the GAS and GAI were both significantly and strongly negatively associated with mindfulness as measured by the MAAS (-.69, -.72) and the KIMS (-.54, -.58), showing that higher anxiety was associated with lower mindfulness, as expected. The GAS (.70) and GAI (.76) were both significantly and strongly positively associated with experiential avoidance (AAQ-II), showing that higher anxiety was associated with higher avoidance, as expected. Likewise, the GAS (.37) and GAI (.54) were both significantly and moderately positively associated with anxiety sensitivity (ASI-3), showing that higher anxiety was associated with higher anxiety sensitivity, as expected. For each of these risk factors, there were no significant differences between the correlations for the GAS and the GAI, showing that both measures performed well but with no meaningful advantages of one over the other.
机译:晚年生活中的焦虑是主要的临床问题,对准确评估存在明显的障碍。老年焦虑量表(GAS)和老年焦虑量表(GAI)代表了两种针对老年人的评估工具,这些工具最近已经开发和验证。这项研究的目的是检查这两种措施与已知的焦虑风险因素的收敛有效性,并直接比较这些措施。居住在社区的老年人完成了GAS,GAI和涵盖三种焦虑风险因素的四项措施:正念注意意识量表(MAAS),肯塔基州正念技能清单(KIMS),接受和行动问卷II(AAQ- II)和焦虑敏感指数3(ASI-3)。计算了GAS和GAI与危险因素之间的相关性。结果表明,按MAAS(-.69,-.72)和KIMS(-.54,-.58)的测量,GAS和GAI与正念显着显着负相关,表明较高的焦虑与正念相关。如预期的那样降低正念。 GAS(.70)和GAI(.76)均与体验回避(AAQ-II)显着且强烈正相关,表明较高的焦虑与预期回避相关。同样,GAS(.37)和GAI(.54)均与焦虑敏感性(ASI-3)显着正相关,与预期的一样,表明较高的焦虑与较高的焦虑敏感性相关。对于这些风险因素中的每一个,GAS和GAI的相关性之间都没有显着差异,这表明这两种措施均表现良好,但没有一项比另一项有意义的优势。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    O Noel; M Pifer; C Mahoney; D Segal;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(2),Suppl 1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 283
  • 总页数 1
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号