首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The multi-vessel and diffuse coronary spasm is a risk factor for persistent angina in patients received anti-angina medication
【2h】

The multi-vessel and diffuse coronary spasm is a risk factor for persistent angina in patients received anti-angina medication

机译:多支血管和弥漫性冠状动脉痉挛是接受抗心绞痛药物治疗的患者持续性心绞痛的危险因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Coronary artery spasm (CAS) is known to be a risk factor for cardiovascular events. However, there is limited data whether the multi-vessel and diffuse spasm (MVDS) is related to more adverse clinical outcomes compared to the Non-MVDS. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the MVDS on clinical outcomes during a 3-year clinical follow-up period.A total 2797 patients underwent coronary angiography (CAG) with acetylcholine (ACH) provocation test from Nov 2004 to Oct 2010 were enrolled. It is a single-center, observational, prospective, all-comers registry designed to reflect the “real world” practic. The patients were divided into the 3 groups; the negative spasm (NS) group (n = 1188), the Non-MVDS group (n = 1081), and the MVDS group (n = 528). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and recurrent angina was evaluated up to 3 years. To minimize confounding factors, multivariable Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis was performed.In the 3-year clinical follow-up, the incidence of total death, myocardial infarction, de novo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), cerebrovascular accident and MACE were similar among the 3 groups. However, recurrent angina occurred more frequently in the MVDS group than in the NS group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27–3.02; P = .002). Recurrence angina between the MVDS group and the Non-MVDS group was not statistically significant (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.91–2.03; P = .129).In this study, although the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events were not different regardless of spasm type, the MVDS was associated with higher incidence of recurrent chest pain requiring repeat CAG during the 3-year follow-up period, suggesting more intensive optimal medical therapy with close clinical follow up would be necessary for this particular subset of patients.
机译:冠状动脉痉挛(CAS)是心血管事件的危险因素。但是,与非MVDS相比,多血管和弥漫性痉挛(MVDS)是否与更不利的临床结果相关的数据有限。这项研究的目的是评估在三年的临床随访期内MVDS对临床结局的影响.2004年11月至2010年10月,共有2797例患者接受了乙酰胆碱(ACH)激发试验的冠状动脉造影(CAG)被录取了。它是一个单中心,观察性,前瞻性,所有参与者的注册表,旨在反映“现实世界”的实践。将患者分为3组。负痉挛(NS)组(n = 1188),非MVDS组(n = 1081)和MVDS组(n = 528)。评估长达3年的主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和复发性心绞痛的发生率。为了减少混杂因素,进行了多变量Cox比例风险回归分析。在3年的临床随访中,总死亡,心肌梗死,从头经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),脑血管意外和MACE的发生率相似3组。但是,MVDS组的复发性心绞痛发生率比NS组高(危险比[HR]为1.96; 95%置信区间[CI]为1.27-3.02; P = 0.002)。 MVDS组和非MVDS组之间的复发性心绞痛无统计学意义(HR,1.36; 95%CI,0.91-2.03; P = .129)。在本研究中,尽管主要不良心血管事件的发生率没有差异不论痉挛类型如何,MVDS均与复发性胸痛的较高发生率相关,需要在3年的随访期间重复进行CAG,这表明对于该特定患者子群,有必要进行更深入的最佳药物治疗并进行密切的临床随访。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号