首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil
【2h】

Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil

机译:从生物固体和土壤中提取聚苯乙烯纳米塑料和微塑料的效率低下

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Extraction and quantification of nano- and microplastics from sediments and soils is challenging. Although no standard method has been established so far, flotation is commonly used to separate plastic from mineral material. The objective of this study was to test the efficiency of flotation for the extraction of nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil. We spiked biosolids and soil samples with polystyrene nano- and microbeads (0.05, 1.0, 2.6, 4.8, and 100 μm diameter). Different extraction methods (w/ and w/o H2O2 digestion) were tested, and plastic beads were separated from mineral particles by flotation in a ZnCl2 solution. Plastic particles were quantified by UV-Vis spectrometry and gravimetrically. While large beads (100 μm) could be quantitatively extracted (∼100%) from both biosolids and soils, smaller beads had low extraction efficiencies (ranging from 5 to 80%, with an average of 20%). Except for the 100 μm beads, oxidation with H2O2 negatively impacted the extraction efficiencies. For the soil, extraction with water only, followed by flotation in a ZnCl2 solution, resulted in relatively high extraction efficiencies (>75%) for beads larger than 1 μm, but low efficiencies (<30%) for the 0.05 and 1.0 μm beads. Our results indicate that while flotation generally works to separate plastic nano- and microbeads in a solution, the challenge is to quantitatively extract nano- and microbeads from a biosolids or soil matrix. Samples high in organic matter content require removal of the organic matter, but the common method of H2O2 oxidation leads to poor extraction efficiencies for nano- and microbeads.
机译:从沉积物和土壤中提取和量化纳米塑料和微塑料具有挑战性。尽管到目前为止尚未建立标准方法,但浮选法通常用于将塑料与矿物材料分离。这项研究的目的是测试浮选法从生物固体和土壤中提取纳米塑料和微塑料的效率。我们在生物固体和土壤样品中掺入了聚苯乙烯纳米和微珠(直径为0.05、1.0、2.6、4.8和100μm)。测试了不同的提取方法(不使用和不使用H2O2消解),并通过在ZnCl2溶液中进行浮选从矿物颗粒中分离出塑料珠。通过UV-Vis光谱法和重量分析法定量塑料颗粒。虽然可以从生物固体和土壤中定量提取(约100%)大珠子(约100%),但较小的珠子提取效率低(从5%到80%不等,平均为20%)。除了100μm的珠以外,H2O2的氧化会对萃取效率产生负面影响。对于土壤,仅用水萃取,然后在ZnCl2溶液中浮选,对于大于1μm的珠子,可获得相对较高的萃取效率(> 75%),而对于0.05和1.0μm的珠子则可获得较低的萃取效率(<30%) 。我们的结果表明,虽然浮选通常可将溶液中的塑料纳米珠和微珠分离,但挑战在于从生物固体或土壤基质中定量提取纳米珠和微珠。有机物含量高的样品需要去除有机物,但是常见的H2O2氧化方法导致纳米珠和微珠的提取效率较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号