首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >No Effect of a Self-Help Book for Insomnia in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Comorbid Chronic Insomnia – A Randomized Controlled Trial
【2h】

No Effect of a Self-Help Book for Insomnia in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Comorbid Chronic Insomnia – A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:自助书对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和合并性慢性失眠患者的失眠没有作用-一项随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: To compare the effects of a self-help book for insomnia to that of sleep hygiene advice in a randomized controlled trial with follow-up after about 3 months among patients who were diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and comorbid chronic insomnia, and who were concurrently initiating treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).>Methods: In all, 164 patients were included. OSA was diagnosed and categorized based on a standard respiratory polygraphic sleep study using a type 3 portable monitor. The self-help book focused on cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. The main outcome measure was insomnia severity assessed with the Bergen Insomnia Scale (BIS) and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI).>Results: The scores on the BIS improved significantly from pre-treatment to follow-up in the sleep hygiene advice group (26.8 vs. 21.8) and in the self-help book group (26.3 vs. 22.4). Similarly, the ISI scores were significantly improved in both conditions (sleep hygiene: 17.0 vs. 14.1; self-help book: 16.6 vs. 13.6). No time × condition interaction effects were detected, suggesting that the self-help book did not improve insomnia symptoms more than the sleep hygiene advice.>Conclusion: In this randomized controlled trial among patients with OSA and comorbid insomnia who were initiating CPAP treatment, concurrently treating their insomnia with a self-help book did not improve sleep more than sleep hygiene advice. The statistically significant improved sleep at follow-up in both groups is most likely explained by the CPAP treatment.
机译:>目的:在被诊断为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的患者中,约3个月后进行了一项随机对照试验,对随访中的失眠自助书与睡眠卫生建议的效果进行了比较( OSA)和合并症的慢性失眠,并同时接受持续气道正压通气治疗(CPAP)。>方法:包括164例患者。使用3型便携式监护仪,根据标准的呼吸多形睡眠研究对OSA进行了诊断和分类。自助书侧重于失眠的认知行为疗法。主要结局指标是采用卑尔根失眠量表(BIS)和失眠严重度指数(ISI)评估的失眠严重程度。>结果: BIS评分从治疗前到随访均显着改善。睡眠卫生建议组(26.8对21.8)和自助书组(26.3对22.4)。同样,两种情况下的ISI分数都有显着提高(睡眠卫生:17.0 vs. 14.1;自助书:16.6 vs. 13.6)。没有时间×条件相互作用的影响,这表明自助书对失眠症状的改善不超过睡眠卫生建议。>结论:在这项针对OSA和合并症的失眠患者中的随机对照试验他们开始进行CPAP治疗,同时用自助书治疗失眠并没有比睡眠卫生建议更好地改善睡眠。 CPAP治疗最有可能解释了两组随访时睡眠的统计学上显着改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号