首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal technique versus open surgery with the ULTRAPRO Hernia System for the repair of female primary femoral hernias—an observational retrospective study
【2h】

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal technique versus open surgery with the ULTRAPRO Hernia System for the repair of female primary femoral hernias—an observational retrospective study

机译:腹腔镜腹膜前腹膜技术与ULTRAPRO疝气系统开放手术修复女性原发性股疝的观察性回顾性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Femoral hernias (FHs), predominantly seen in females, require surgery for cure. To date, surgical repair of primary FHs in female patients with either open surgery or laparoscopic operation has been poorly documented. We retrospectively investigated the treatment of female primary FHs with open surgery using the ULTRAPRO Hernia System (UHS procedure) or the laparoscopic procedure, namely, the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique. A total of 41 female patients with primary FHs who had undergone UHS or TAPP were included in this study. The procedural parameters, post-surgical complications, treatment expense, and follow-up results were analyzed. The vast majority of patients (39/41) underwent elective operations: 15 received UHS (including 2 emergency cases) and 26 had TAPP (P = .08). The UHS group had a greater average age, due to the fact that FHs occur often in people with advanced age who tend to have systemic disease, limiting the use of general anesthesia required for TAPP. Compared with UHS, TAPP took a significantly shorter time to complete and patients undergoing TAPP had a dramatically shorter hospital stay. While no recurrence was observed in both groups, post-procedure pain and foreign body sensation were reported by significantly more patients in UHS group. The cost was greater with TAPP. Taken together, we concluded that both UHS and TAPP are effective in the management of female FHs. In view of the advantages and disadvantages between the open and the laparoscopic operation, surgeons can select a procedure according to their skills and patients’ situation.
机译:股疝(FHs)主要存在于女性中,需要手术治疗。迄今为止,公开手术或腹腔镜手术的女性患者原发性FH的手术修复的文献很少。我们回顾性调查了使用ULTRAPRO疝气系统(UHS手术)或腹腔镜手术(即经腹前腹膜(TAPP)技术)进行的开放手术对女性原发性FH的治疗。本研究共纳入了41名接受过UHS或TAPP的原发性FH的女性患者。分析了手术参数,手术后并发症,治疗费用和随访结果。绝大多数患者(39/41)进行了择期手术:15例接受了UHS(包括2例紧急情况),26例进行了TAPP(P = .08)。 UHS组的平均年龄较高,这是由于FH通常发生在往往患有系统性疾病的高龄人群中,从而限制了TAPP所需的全身麻醉的使用。与UHS相比,TAPP花费的时间明显缩短,而接受TAPP的患者的住院时间大大缩短。虽然两组均未观察到复发,但UHS组中有更多的患者报告了术后疼痛和异物感。使用TAPP的成本更高。综上所述,我们得出的结论是,UHS和TAPP在女性FH的管理中均有效。考虑到开放手术和腹腔镜手术之间的优缺点,外科医生可以根据自己的技能和患者情况选择一种手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号