首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Written-Word Concreteness Effects in Non-attend Conditions: Evidence From Mismatch Responses and Cortical Oscillations
【2h】

Written-Word Concreteness Effects in Non-attend Conditions: Evidence From Mismatch Responses and Cortical Oscillations

机译:无人值守条件下的书面具体性影响:不匹配响应和皮质振荡的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It has been widely reported that concrete words have processing advantages over abstract words in terms of speed and efficiency of processing, a phenomenon known as the concreteness effect. However, little is still known about the early time-course of processing concrete and abstract words and whether this concreteness effect can still persist in conditions where attention is not focused on the words presented (automatic processing). This study aimed to shed light on these issues by examining the electrophysiological brain responses to concrete and abstract words. While participants were engaged in a non-linguistic color tracking task presented in the center of the monitor screen, matched Chinese concrete and abstract single-character words appeared within a passive oddball paradigm, out of the focus of attention. In calculating visual Mismatch Negativity (vMMN), Event-related potentials (ERPs) to words of the same semantic category were compared when these words were presented as deviants and standards. Before 320 ms, both abstract and concrete words yielded vMMN with left-lateralized distribution, suggesting similar verbal processing at an initial processing stage. After 320 ms, only concrete words additionally elicited vMMN with a central distribution. Time frequency (TF) analysis of the results also revealed larger theta power increase (200–300 ms) and theta power phase locking (200–450 ms) for concrete than for abstract words. Interestingly, there was more alpha power decrease for abstract than for concrete words from 300 to 450 ms. This may reflect the greater difficulty in processing abstract meaning. Taken together, our ERP and TF results point to the existence of different neural mechanisms underlying non-attentive processing of abstract and concrete words.
机译:据广泛报道,在处理的速度和效率方面,具体单词比抽象单词具有处理优势,这种现象被称为具体效果。但是,对于处理具体和抽象单词的早期过程以及在注意力不集中在呈现的单词(自动处理)的情况下,这种具体效果是否还能持续仍然知之甚少。这项研究旨在通过检查大脑对具体和抽象单词的反应来阐明这些问题。当参与者从事在监视器屏幕中央显示的非语言颜色跟踪任务时,匹配的中文具体和抽象单字符单词出现在被动的奇数范例中,而没有引起人们的关注。在计算视觉失配否定性(vMMN)时,当这些单词被作为偏差和标准出现时,会比较事件相关电位(ERP)与相同语义类别的单词。在320毫秒之前,抽象词和具体词都产生具有左侧分布的vMMN,这表明在初始处理阶段进行了类似的语言处理。在320 ms之后,只有具体单词会额外引发具有中心分布的vMMN。结果的时间频率(TF)分析还显示,与抽象词相比,混凝土的theta功率增加(200–300 ms)和theta功率锁相(200–450 ms)更大。有趣的是,从300到450毫秒,抽象的alpha功率降低比具体单词要多。这可能反映了处理抽象含义的更大困难。两者合计,我们的ERP和TF结果表明存在不同的神经机制,这些机制是对抽象和具体单词进行非专心处理的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号