首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society >Shear Bond Strength of Composite Veneers and Acrylic Veneer Bonded to Ni–Cr Alloy: A Laboratory Study
【2h】

Shear Bond Strength of Composite Veneers and Acrylic Veneer Bonded to Ni–Cr Alloy: A Laboratory Study

机译:Ni-Cr合金复合单板和丙烯酸单板的剪切粘结强度的实验室研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A growing number of composite materials are being used as an alternative for veneering cast restorations. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of UDMA based composite, restorative composite, and heat cure acrylic when veneered to Ni–Cr alloy and to evaluate the type of bond failure. Three different veneering materials were used: heat cure acrylic, UDMA based composite and a restorative composite. 10 samples were fabricated, each with heat cure acrylic and restorative composite and 20 samples were fabricated with UDMA based composite; thus, the total number of samples amounted to 40. All the samples were subject to shear bond stress fracture tests and observed for the type of bond failure. The greatest mean shear bond strength was recorded in relation to the UDMA based composite material when thermal conducting paste was used during the curing (10.51 MPa). The mean bond strength values of UDMA based composite without thermal conducting paste (8.92 MPa), heat cured acrylic veneering material (4.24 MPa) and restorative composite material (5.03 MPa) were significantly different from each other (p > 0.05). Samples veneered with heat cure acrylic veneering material and restorative composite material showed adhesive failure. Samples prepared with UDMA based composite veneering composite showed cohesive or predominantly cohesive failure. UDMA based composite veneering material when used with heat protection paste exceeds the shear bond strength requirement as suggested by Matsumura et al. (>10 MPa). A statistically significant association between the test groups and the type of failure was observed.
机译:越来越多的复合材料被用作饰面铸件修复的替代材料。这项研究的目的是评估和比较以UDMA为基的复合材料,修复性复合材料和热固性丙烯酸树脂在贴合Ni-Cr合金时的剪切粘结强度,并评估粘结破坏的类型。使用了三种不同的装饰材料:热固化丙烯酸,基于UDMA的复合材料和修复性复合材料。制作了10个样品,每个样品都使用了热固性丙烯酸和修复性复合材料,而使用UDMA基复合材料制作了20个样品。因此,样品总数为40。对所有样品进行剪切粘结应力断裂测试,并观察其粘结破坏的类型。当在固化过程中使用导热胶时(10.51MPa),记录到的最大平均剪切粘结强度是相对于基于UDMA的复合材料而言的。没有导热膏的UDMA基复合材料的平均粘结强度值(8.92 MPa),热固化丙烯酸饰面材料(4.24 MPa)和恢复性复合材料(5.03 MPa)彼此之间存在显着差异(p> 0.05)。用热固化丙烯酸饰面材料和修复性复合材料制成的单板样品显示出粘合失败。用基于UDMA的复合饰面复合材料制备的样品表现出内聚或主要内聚破坏。当与隔热膏一起使用时,基于UDMA的复合饰面材料超过了Matsumura等人提出的抗剪强度要求。 (> 10 MPa)。观察到测试组与失败类型之间的统计显着关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号