首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A novel diagnostic method for distinguishing parapneumonic effusion and empyema from other diseases by using the pleural lactate dehydrogenase to adenosine deaminase ratio and carcinoembryonic antigen levels
【2h】

A novel diagnostic method for distinguishing parapneumonic effusion and empyema from other diseases by using the pleural lactate dehydrogenase to adenosine deaminase ratio and carcinoembryonic antigen levels

机译:通过使用胸膜乳酸脱氢酶与腺苷脱氨酶之比和癌胚抗原水平将肺炎旁积液和脓胸与其他疾病区分开来的新诊断方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pleural effusions are a common medical problem not only for pulmonologists but also for general physicians, often needing thoracentesis for a definite diagnosis. However, thoracentesis cannot always reveal malignant cells or microbiological evidence.In this context, we prospectively enrolled a total of 289 patients with pleural effusions due to diverse etiologies: parapneumonic effusion (PPE) (63), empyema (22), tuberculous pleural effusion (TBPE) (54), malignant pleural effusion (MPE) (140), or chronic renal failure (CRF)/congestive heart failure (CHF) (10). The MPE group consisted of lung cancer (adenocarcinoma, n = 90; squamous cell carcinoma, n = 5; small cell carcinoma, n = 4), malignant lymphoma (n = 17), malignant mesothelioma (n = 11), malignant melanoma (n = 3), and metastasis from other organs (n = 10).This study demonstrated that the pleural lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)to adenosine deaminase (ADA) ratios differed significantly between patients with CHF/CRF, MPE, TBPE, empyema, and PPE. We discovered a simple method to differentiate pleural diseases based on the pleural LDH to ADA ratio and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). A pleural LDH to ADA ratio greater than 15.5 and a pleural CEA level of less than 5 ng/mL is indicative of PPE or empyema rather than TBPE, MPE, or transudative pleural effusion (CRF, CHF).This method has a sensitivity of 62.0%, a specificity of 91.0%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.765 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0678–0.852, P < .001), odds ratio of 16.6 (95% CI: 7.28–37.8, P < .001), a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 6.8, and a negative LR of 0.02.
机译:胸腔积液不仅是肺科医生的普遍医学问题,也是普通医师的常见医学难题,通常需要进行胸腔穿刺术才能明确诊断。然而,胸腔穿刺术并不总是能显示出恶性细胞或微生物学证据。在此背景下,我们前瞻性收集了289例因多种病因引起的胸腔积液患者:肺炎旁积液(PPE)(63),脓胸(22),结核性胸腔积液( TBPE)(54),恶性胸腔积液(MPE)(140)或慢性肾衰竭(CRF)/充血性心力衰竭(CHF)(10)。 MPE组包括肺癌(腺癌,n = 90);鳞状细胞癌,n = 5;小细胞癌,n = 4;恶性淋巴瘤(n = 17),恶性间皮瘤(n = 11),恶性黑色素瘤( n = 3)和其他器官的转移(n = 10)。本研究表明,CHF / CRF,MPE,TBPE,脓胸和胸水患者的胸膜乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)与腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)比率存在显着差异。个人防护装备。我们发现了一种基于胸膜LDH与ADA之比和癌胚抗原(CEA)来区分胸膜疾病的简单方法。胸膜LDH与ADA的比率大于15.5,胸膜CEA水平小于5μng/ mL表示PPE或脓胸而非TBPE,MPE或渗出性胸腔积液(CRF,CHF)。此方法的灵敏度为62.0 %,特异性为91.0%,接收器工作特性曲线下的面积为0.765(95%置信区间[CI]:0678-0.852,P <0.001),优势比为16.6(95%CI:7.23-37.8) ,P <.001),正似然比(LR)为6.8,负LR为0.02。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号