首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of IMA >The End of Life The Ends of Life: An Anthropological View
【2h】

The End of Life The Ends of Life: An Anthropological View

机译:生命的尽头生命的尽头:人类学的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

All known human societies have a worldview that deserves to be called religion; all religions must explain death. Anthropologists study the diversity of religious systems, present and past, in order to understand what is common to humanity. Rather than starting from the view of a particular revelation or set of doctrines, the anthropologist tries to step outside his or her own subjective worldview and identify patterns in the evolution of human thinking about the reality of physical death. Are humans the only animals that are conscious of death, or do we share sentiments observable in our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees? At what point in history did the concept of an afterlife, life in some spiritual sense after physical death, appear? Is the religious explanation of life and death a mere reflection of a communal social fact, as the sociologist Emil Durkheim suggested, or a shared psychological trait, as more recent scholars assert? Can and should the modern scientist make a definitive statement about the finality of death and human consciousness?
机译:所有已知的人类社会都有一种世界观,应该称之为宗教。所有宗教都必须解释死亡。人类学家研究了当今和过去宗教制度的多样性,以了解人类共有的东西。人类学家不是从一个特定的启示或一套学说的观点出发,而是试图走出他或她自己的主观世界观,并确定人类对身体死亡的现实思考的演变模式。是人类唯一意识到死亡的动物,还是我们在最亲密的近亲黑猩猩中观察到的共同情感?在历史的什么时候出现了来世的概念,即死后某种精神意义上的生活?正如社会学家埃米尔·迪克海姆(Emil Durkheim)所建议的那样,对生死的宗教解释仅仅是社会公共事实的反映,还是新近学者所断言的共同心理特征?现代科学家能否也应该就死亡和人类意识的终结性做出明确的陈述?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号