首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of Quantamatrix Multiplexed Assay Platform and GenoType MTBDR Assay Using Smear-Positive Sputum Specimens From Patients With Multidrug- Resistant/Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in South Korea
【2h】

Comparison of Quantamatrix Multiplexed Assay Platform and GenoType MTBDR Assay Using Smear-Positive Sputum Specimens From Patients With Multidrug- Resistant/Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in South Korea

机译:来自韩国多药耐药/广泛耐药结核病患者涂片阳性痰标本的Quantamatrix复用测定平台和GenoType MTBDR测定的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Rapid detection of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is crucial for timely treatment and management. The GenoType MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl (MTBDR) assays have been endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the detection of DR-TB. However, MTBDR assays cannot simultaneously detect multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB). Furthermore, interpretation of the MTBDR assay requires trained people, and the assay has low sample throughput, processing only up to 12 samples in parallel. We have developed the Quantamatrix Multiplexed Assay Platform (QMAP) to detect MDR-/XDR-TB simultaneously. The interpretation of QMAP results is automated, and the platform can process up to 96 samples in parallel. To compare the performance of QMAP with MTBDR assays, we performed QMAP and the MTBDR assay on 76 smear-positive, Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture-positive sputum specimens. Compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) results, the sensitivity and specificity of QMAP were 100 and 98% for rifampin resistance, 80 and 100% for isoniazid resistance, 44.4 and 100% for ethambutol resistance, 100 and 100% for fluoroquinolone resistance, and 100 and 100% for second-line injectable drug resistance, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MTBDR assays were 100 and 98% for rifampin resistance, 80 and 100% for isoniazid resistance, 44.4 and 98.1% for ethambutol resistance, 100 and 100% for fluoroquinolone resistance, and 100 and 100% for second-line injectable drug resistance, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of QMAP were 85.0 and 100%, respectively, for the detection of MDR-TB and 100 and 100%, respectively, for XDR-TB. The sensitivity and specificity of MTBDR assays was consistent with those of QMAP. Our study showed that the QMAP assay has sensitivity and specificity equivalent to that of MTBDR assays in smear-positive sputum specimens. In combination with phenotypic DST, QMAP might be useful as a supplementary DST assay for rapid detection of MDR-/XDR-TB.
机译:快速发现耐药结核病(DR-TB)对于及时治疗和管理至关重要。 GenoType MTBDRplus和MTBDRsl(MTBDR)分析已获得世界卫生组织(WHO)的认可,可用于检测DR-TB。但是,MTBDR分析不能同时检测耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)和广泛耐药菌病(XDR-TB)。此外,对MTBDR分析的解释需要训练有素的人员,并且该分析的样品通量较低,最多只能并行处理12个样品。我们已经开发了Quantamatrix多重检测平台(QMAP),可以同时检测MDR- / XDR-TB。 QMAP结果的解释是自动的,该平台可以并行处理多达96个样品。为了比较QMAP与MTBDR测定的性能,我们对76例涂片阳性,结核分枝杆菌培养阳性痰标本进行了QMAP和MTBDR测定。与表型药敏测试(DST)结果相比,QMAP的利福平耐药性为100和98%,异烟肼耐药性为80和100%,乙胺丁醇耐药性为44.4和100%,氟喹诺酮耐药性为100和100%,二线可注射耐药性分别为100%和100%。 MTBDR分析的灵敏度和特异性分别为:对利福平耐药性为100和98%,对异烟肼耐药性为80和100%,对乙胺丁醇耐药性为44.4和98.1%,对氟喹诺酮耐药性为100和100%,对于二线注射剂为100和100%分别耐药。 QMAP对MDR-TB的检测灵敏度和特异性分别为85.0和100%,对XDR-TB的检测分别为100和100%。 MTBDR分析的敏感性和特异性与QMAP一致。我们的研究表明,在涂片阳性痰标本中,QMAP测定法的敏感性和特异性与MTBDR测定法相同。结合表型DST,QMAP可用作快速检测MDR- / XDR-TB的补充DST分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号