首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Characterization of Sigma 1 Receptor Antagonist CM-304 and Its Analog AZ-66: Novel Therapeutics Against Allodynia and Induced Pain
【2h】

Characterization of Sigma 1 Receptor Antagonist CM-304 and Its Analog AZ-66: Novel Therapeutics Against Allodynia and Induced Pain

机译:Sigma 1受体拮抗剂CM-304及其类似物AZ-66的表征:针对异常性疼痛和诱发性疼痛的新型疗法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Sigma-1 receptors (S1R) and sigma-2 receptors (S2R) may modulate nociception without the liabilities of opioids, offering a promising therapeutic target to treat pain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the in vivo analgesic and anti-allodynic activity of two novel sigma receptor antagonists, the S1R-selective CM-304 and its analog the non-selective S1R/S2R antagonist AZ-66. Inhibition of thermal, induced chemical or inflammatory pain, as well as the allodynia resulting from chronic nerve constriction injury (CCI) and cisplatin exposure as models of neuropathic pain were assessed in male mice. Both sigma receptor antagonists dose-dependently (10–45 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced allodynia in the CCI and cisplatin neuropathic pain models, equivalent at the higher dose to the effect of the control analgesic gabapentin (50 mg/kg, i.p.), although AZ-66 demonstrated a much longer duration of action. Both CM-304 and AZ-66 produced antinociception in the writhing test [0.48 (0.09–1.82) and 2.31 (1.02–4.81) mg/kg, i.p., respectively] equivalent to morphine [1.75 (0.31–7.55) mg/kg, i.p.]. Likewise, pretreatment (i.p.) with either sigma-receptor antagonist dose-dependently produced antinociception in the formalin paw assay of inflammatory pain. However, CM-304 [17.5 (12.7–25.2) mg/kg, i.p.) and AZ-66 [11.6 (8.29–15.6) mg/kg, i.p.) were less efficacious than morphine [3.87 (2.85–5.18) mg/kg, i.p.] in the 55°C warm-water tail-withdrawal assay. While AZ-66 exhibited modest sedative effects in a rotarod assay and conditioned place aversion, CM-304 did not produce significant effects in the place conditioning assay. Overall, these results demonstrate the S1R selective antagonist CM-304 produces antinociception and anti-allodynia with fewer liabilities than established therapeutics, supporting the use of S1R antagonists as potential treatments for chronic pain.
机译:Sigma-1受体(S1R)和sigma-2受体(S2R)可以调节伤害感受而无阿片类药物的作用,为治疗疼痛提供了有希望的治疗靶点。这项研究的目的是研究两种新型sigma受体拮抗剂S1R选择性CM-304及其类似物非选择性S1R / S2R拮抗剂AZ-66的体内止痛和抗痛觉过敏活性。在雄性小鼠中评估了热,诱发的化学或炎性疼痛的抑制作用,以及慢性神经收缩损伤(CCI)和顺铂暴露引起的异常性疼痛作为神经性疼痛的模型。两种sigma受体拮抗剂在CCI和顺铂神经性疼痛模型中均剂量依赖性地(10-45 mg / kg,腹膜内)减少异常性疼痛,在较高剂量下相当于对照组止痛加巴喷丁(50 mg / kg,腹腔)的异常疼痛,尽管AZ-66表现出更长的作用时间。扭体试验中CM-304和AZ-66均产生镇痛作用[分别为吗啡[0.48(0.09–1.82)和2.31(1.02–4.81)mg / kg,ip]],相当于吗啡[1.75(0.31–7.55)mg / kg, ip]。同样,在炎性疼痛的福尔马林爪试验中,使用任一种sigma-受体拮抗剂进行剂量前处理(i.p.)都会产生抗伤害感受。但是,CM-304 [17.5(12.7–25.2)mg / kg,ip)和AZ-66 [11.6(8.29–15.6)mg / kg,ip)比吗啡[3.87(2.85–5.18)mg / kg ,ip]在55°C的温水尾撤试验中进行。尽管AZ-66在旋转脚架测定中显示出适度的镇静作用,并在条件上规避位置,但CM-304在位置调节中并未产生明显的镇静作用。总体而言,这些结果表明,S1R选择性拮抗剂CM-304产生的抗伤害性和抗痛觉过敏的责任比已建立的疗法少,这支持使用S1R拮抗剂作为慢性疼痛的潜在治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号