首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Characterization of Breast Lesions Using a Novel Combined Approach of Ultrasonography and Elastography Prior to Invasive Procedures: Are New Age Modalities Set to Replace the Diagnostic Giant?
【2h】

Characterization of Breast Lesions Using a Novel Combined Approach of Ultrasonography and Elastography Prior to Invasive Procedures: Are New Age Modalities Set to Replace the Diagnostic Giant?

机译:在侵袭性手术之前使用超声波和弹性成像的新型组合方法对乳腺病变进行表征:是否设置了新的年龄模式来代替诊断巨人?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of B-mode ultrasound and ultrasound elastography used alone and in combination for differentiating breast lesions into benign and malignant.Materials and methodsEighty-five patients were investigated with B-mode ultrasonography and elastography and provided a Breast Imaging Reporting, and Data System (BI-RADS) score based on ultrasonography, strain ratio, and elastography score (ES) based on elastography. Each lesion was then evaluated by a combination method, combining BI-RADS with strain ratio and BI-RADS with elastography score. Each modality was assessed for the successful detection and characterization of the lesion and whether combining ultrasonography B-mode imaging with strain elastography improves diagnosis and is reliable enough to replace invasive procedures such as biopsy that have been the mainstay of diagnosis.ResultsOf 85 lesions, 23 lesions (27%) were found to be malignant, and 62 lesions (72.9%) were benign. When used alone, BI-RADS had 100.0% sensitivity, 13% specificity, 50% and 100% positive and negative predictive values (respectively), and 72.9% accuracy. BI-RADS results were then combined with strain ratio (SR) and ES. BI-RADS with SR had 91.3% sensitivity, 95.2% specificity, 87.5% and 96.7% positive and negative predictive values (respectively), and 94.1% accuracy. Similarly, BI-RADS with ES had 91.3% sensitivity, 93.5% specificity, 84.0% and 96.7% positive and negative predictive values, and 92.9% accuracy.ConclusionsThe combination method performs better at diagnosing breast lesions than BI-RADS alone and can be used as an early and preliminary basis for diagnosis and in settings where invasive procedures cannot be performed. Combining strain elastography and BI-RADS also help characterize which lesions are better suited for biopsy, leading to a decline in unnecessary invasive procedures.
机译:目的本研究旨在评估B型超声和超声弹性成像技术单独使用或联合使用以区分乳腺病变为良性和恶性的诊断率。材料和方法对85例B型超声和弹性成像患者进行了调查,并提供基于超声检查的乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)评分,基于弹性成像的应变率和弹性成像评分(ES)。然后通过组合方法评估每个病变,将具有应变比的BI-RADS和具有弹性成像评分的BI-RADS进行组合。评估了每种方式是否能够成功检测和表征病变,以及将超声B型成像与应变弹性成像相结合是否可以改善诊断并足够可靠地替代侵入性程序,例如活检是诊断的主要手段。结果85个病变中有23个发现病变(27%)为恶性,有62个病变(72.9%)为良性。单独使用时,BI-RADS的灵敏度为100.0%,特异性为13%,阳性和阴性的预测值分别为50%和100%,准确度为72.9%。然后将BI-RADS结果与应变比(SR)和ES相结合。具有SR的BI-RADS的敏感性为91.3%,特异性为95.2%,阳性和阴性的预测值分别为87.5%和96.7%,准确度为94.1%。同样,具有ES的BI-RADS具有91.3%的敏感性,93.5%的特异性,84.0%和96.7%的阳性和阴性预测值以及92.9%的准确性。结论组合方法在诊断乳腺病变方面比单独使用BI-RADS更好,可以使用作为诊断的早期和初步依据,以及无法进行侵入性手术的环境。应变弹性成像和BI-RADS的结合还有助于确定哪些病变更适合活检,从而减少不必要的侵入性手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号