首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Protective Effect Conferred by Isometric Preconditioning Against Slow- and Fast-Velocity Eccentric Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage
【2h】

Protective Effect Conferred by Isometric Preconditioning Against Slow- and Fast-Velocity Eccentric Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage

机译:等距预处理对慢速和快速离心运动引起的肌肉损伤的保护作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We investigated if the same isometric preconditioning protocol (IPP) attenuates the magnitude of muscle damage induced by different maximal eccentric exercise protocols in the elbow flexors. Sixty-four untrained men were assigned to either two experimental or two control groups. Participants in the experimental groups performed an IPP prior to either slow (60°·s−1 – ISO + ECC-S) or fast (180°·s−1 – ISO + ECC-F) maximal eccentric contractions (MaxECC). Subjects in the control groups performed slow (ECC-S) or fast (ECC-F) MaxECC without IPP. Maximal isokinetic concentric torque (MVC), muscle soreness (SOR), and muscle thickness (MT) were assessed before, immediately after, and 1–4 days following the MaxECC. Significant (p < 0.05) group vs. time interactions were found for MVC (F = 4,517), SOR (F = 6,318), and MT (F = 1,863). The ECC-S group presented faster (p < 0.05) recovery of MVC and MT and less (p < 0.05) SOR at 96 h post-MaxECC compared with ECC-F group. No significant differences in MVC and MT were found between ECC-S and ECC-F groups following MaxECC. The ISO + ECC-S group showed faster (p < 0.05) recovery of MVC and SOR compared to the ECC-S group. No significant differences were evident between ISO + ECC-S and ECC-S in any variable. The ISO + ECC-F group showed faster (p < 0.05) recovery of all assessed variables compared with the ECC-F group. MVC was greater (p < 0.05) at 48–72 h, and SOR was less (p < 0.05) at 48–96 h in the ISO + ECC-F compared to the ECC-F group. No significant differences were evident between ISO + ECC-S and ISO + ECC-F for any variable. These results show that the IPP accelerated recovery of MVC and SOR for the slow-eccentric exercise condition and attenuated strength loss and SOR in addition to faster recovery of all assessed variables for the fast-eccentric exercise condition. Therefore, the IPP can be used as a strategy to attenuate and accelerate recovery of muscle damage induced by different-velocity eccentric exercises, resulting in greater protection against muscle damage induced by faster velocity.
机译:我们研究了相同的等距预处理协议(IPP)是否减弱了肘部屈肌中不同最大离心运动规程引起的肌肉损伤的程度。 64名未经训练的男人被分配到两个实验组或两个对照组。实验组的参与者在慢速(60°·s -1 – ISO + ECC-S)或快速(180°·s -1 – ISO + ECC-F)最大偏心收缩率(MaxECC)。对照组中的受试者在没有IPP的情况下执行了慢速(ECC-S)或快速(ECC-F)MaxECC。在MaxECC之前,之后和之后1-4天,评估了最大等速同心扭矩(MVC),肌肉酸痛(SOR)和肌肉厚度(MT)。在MVC(F = 4,517),SOR(F = 6,318)和MT(F = 1,863)中发现了显着的(p <0.05)组与时间的相互作用。与ECC-F组相比,MaxECC后96小时,ECC-S组的MVC和MT恢复更快(p <0.05),SOR较少(p <0.05)。在MaxECC之后,ECC-S和ECC-F组之间的MVC和MT没有显着差异。与ECC-S组相比,ISO + ECC-S组显示MVC和SOR恢复更快(p <0.05)。在任何变量中,ISO + ECC-S和ECC-S之间没有明显差异。与ECC-F组相比,ISO + ECC-F组显示所有评估变量的恢复更快(p <0.05)。与ECC-F组相比,ISO + ECC-F组在48-72 h时MVC较大(p <0.05),而SOR在48-96 h时较小(p <0.05)。对于任何变量,ISO + ECC-S和ISO + ECC-F之间没有明显差异。这些结果表明,IPP加快了慢离心运动条件下的MVC和SOR的恢复,并减弱了强度损失和SOR,此外还加快了快离心运动条件下所有评估变量的恢复。因此,IPP可以用作减轻和加速由不同速度的离心运动引起的肌肉损伤恢复的策略,从而对更快的速度引起的肌肉损伤具有更大的保护作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号