首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery >Despite the Effects of Tension and Intraluminal Pressure Which Suture Technique Is the Most Appropriate for Prevention of Air Leakage or Anastomotic Dehiscence in Tracheal Anastomoses in the Short Term? An Experimental Research on Ex Vivo Model
【2h】

Despite the Effects of Tension and Intraluminal Pressure Which Suture Technique Is the Most Appropriate for Prevention of Air Leakage or Anastomotic Dehiscence in Tracheal Anastomoses in the Short Term? An Experimental Research on Ex Vivo Model

机译:尽管有张力和管腔内压力的影响哪种缝合技术最适合短期内防止气管吻合口漏气或吻合口裂?体内模型的实验研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: We performed an experimental study comparing different suture techniques in trachea anastomoses using the ex vivo sheep model, which deals with the parameters that suture tension, air leakage, intraluminal pressure, and tension at which the anastomosis will rupture. We aimed to find an answer to “Which suture technique should be used in tracheal anastomoses?”Methods: In all, 45 sheep tracheas were randomly divided into three groups (each n = 15) differing in suture technique for anastomoses: single stitches, mixed, and continuous suture. The anastomoses were evaluated for air leakage under normal (25 mbar) and high (70 mbar) intraluminal pressures without tension. Then, air leakage was followed under high intraluminal pressure with tensile stress. Tension levels of dehiscence were also recorded. Data were statistically evaluated.Results: No air leakage was observed at 25 mbar intraluminal pressure. At 70 mbar pressure without tension, no statistically significant difference was found among the groups (p >0.05). However, single-stitch technique was the best in terms of air leakage tension and rupture tension levels (p <0.05).Conclusion: The most reliable and advantageous is single-stitch technique for a tracheal anastomosis in short-term results. Further studies are needed to analyze longer ventilation periods in terms of other serious complications as ischemic dehiscence and stenosis.
机译:目的:我们进行了一项实验研究,使用离体绵羊模型比较了气管吻合术中不同的缝合技术,该模型处理了缝合线张力,漏气,管腔内压力以及吻合口破裂处的张力的参数。我们的目的是寻找答案:“应该在气管吻合术中使用哪种缝合技术?”方法:总共将45只绵羊气管随机分为三组(每组n = 15),这三种吻合术的缝合技术有所不同:单针,混合,并持续缝合。评估吻合口在正常(25毫巴)和高(70毫巴)腔内压力(无张力)下的漏气情况。然后,在具有高拉应力的高腔内压力​​下跟踪空气泄漏。还记录了开裂的紧张程度。结果:在25 mbar管腔内压力下未观察到空气泄漏。在无压力的70 mbar压力下,各组之间无统计学差异(p> 0.05)。然而,就气密性和破裂张力水平而言,单针技术是最好的(p <0.05)。结论:短期针气管吻合术最可靠,最有利的是单针技术。就其他严重并发症(如缺血性裂开和狭窄)而言,需要进一步的研究来分析更长的通气时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号