首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EJNMMI Research >Computer-aided diagnosis of renal obstruction: utility of log-linear modeling versus standard ROC and kappa analysis
【2h】

Computer-aided diagnosis of renal obstruction: utility of log-linear modeling versus standard ROC and kappa analysis

机译:肾脏梗阻的计算机辅助诊断:对数线性建模与标准ROC和kappa分析的对立

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software is best evaluated by comparison to a gold standard which represents the true status of disease. In many settings, however, knowledge of the true status of disease is not possible and accuracy is evaluated against the interpretations of an expert panel. Common statistical approaches to evaluate accuracy include receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and kappa analysis but both of these methods have significant limitations and cannot answer the question of equivalence: Is the CAD performance equivalent to that of an expert? The goal of this study is to show the strength of log-linear analysis over standard ROC and kappa statistics in evaluating the accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis of renal obstruction compared to the diagnosis provided by expert readers.
机译:背景技术通过与代表疾病真实状况的金标准进行比较,可以最好地评估计算机辅助诊断(CAD)软件的准确性。但是,在许多情况下,不可能了解疾病的真实状况,并且会根据专家小组的解释来评估准确性。评估准确性的常用统计方法包括接收器工作特性(ROC)和Kappa分析,但是这两种方法都有很大的局限性,无法回答等效问题:CAD性能是否等同于专家的性能?这项研究的目的是证明与专家读者提供的诊断相比,对数线性分析优于标准ROC和kappa统计数据在评估计算机辅助性肾梗阻诊断的准确性方面的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号