首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the International AIDS Society >MEMRI study - feedback of MEMS dosing history improves adherence to long-term HAART: adherence is associated with incidence of ‘blips’ in viral load
【2h】

MEMRI study - feedback of MEMS dosing history improves adherence to long-term HAART: adherence is associated with incidence of ‘blips’ in viral load

机译:MEMRI研究-MEMS给药史的反馈可改善对长期HAART的依从性:依从性与病毒载量斑点的发生率相关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In routine clinical care we investigated the effect on adherence to HAART of feedback to each patient of graphical plots highlighting recent errors in their dosing history, as compiled electronically using MEMS®. Patients established on HAART were randomised to receive either active feedback of recent dosing errors (Group A) at clinic visits, or to serve as controls (no feedback) (Group B). After 12 months the control group were un-blinded and given feedback for a further 6 months. Questionnaires were completed in the waiting room for adherence (GEEMA), Necessity/Concerns, Intrusiveness, Self-efficacy and Conscientiousness (baseline only). Those declining/excluded from using MEMS were invited to complete baseline questionnaires (Group C). Adherence was estimated from MEMS data as the average proportion of days with at least the prescribed number of doses taken between successive appointments. Drug Holidays (DH) were defined as 3 or more consecutive days without dosing. Of a cohort of 727 ~270 were approached. 180 were randomised. 147 had evaluable MEMS data (68 Group B: 79 Group A). 85 were in Group C (questionnaires only). Baseline characteristics were similar between Group A and B. Group C had a less common past history of AIDS. There was no significant difference in baseline conscientiousness between Groups A and B. Missed doses were much more likely at weekends than weekdays (OR=1.25; [1.15–1.35]). Those taking <95% of prescribed doses during the first interval between visits were defined as poor adherers, which included 69 patients (49%). Their average baseline adherence was 78%. In Group A, average adherence increased (p=0.001) to 90% after the first feedback session, while in Group B average adherence remained stable (p=0.405). In Group B, after un-blinding and start of feedback, adherence increased to 93%. Patients in Group B were significantly less likely to bring back their MEMS for reading at each appointment (p=0.031). The incidence of viral load ‘blips’ (>50 copies/ml) was significantly increased by DH (p=0.007), frequency of DH (p=0.016), length of DH (p=0.005), and missed doses during the 4 weeks before attendance (p=0.001). Feedback of electronically compiled dosing history data improves adherence to HAART treatment and appears to be an effective intervention for reducing the incidence of viral load ‘blips’. Further results including analysis of the questionnaires will be presented.
机译:在常规临床护理中,我们调查了通过图形化的MEMS ®电子编辑的,突出显示其给药历史中最近错误的每位患者的反馈对遵守HAART的影响。在HAART上建立的患者被随机分配,以接受临床就诊时近期给药错误的积极反馈(A组),或作为对照(无反馈)(B组)。 12个月后,对照组不致盲并给予另外6个月的反馈。问卷在等候室进行,以确保依从性(GEEMA),必要性/担忧,侵入性,自我效能感和尽责性(仅基线)。邀请那些拒绝使用MEMS的人填写基线调查表(C组)。依从MEMS数据估算的依从性是连续两次约会之间的平均天数比例,至少达到规定剂量。药物休假(DH)被定义为连续3天或更长时间不服药。在727〜270个队列中。 180个被随机分配。 147个具有可评估的MEMS数据(68组B:79组A)。 C组中有85人(仅问卷)。 A组和B组的基线特征相似。C组过去的艾滋病史较不常见。 A组和B组之间的基线尽职调查没有显着差异。周末和工作日相比,错过剂量的可能性更大(OR = 1.25; [1.15-1.35])。在首次就诊间隔期间服用小于95%处方剂量的患者被定义为依从性差,其中包括69名患者(49%)。他们的平均基线依从性为78%。在第一次反馈后,A组的平均依从性增加(p = 0.001)至90%,而B组的平均依从性保持稳定(p = 0.405)。在B组中,在取消盲目性并开始反馈后,依从性增加到93%。在每次约会中,B组患者带回MEMS进行阅读的可能性大大降低(p = 0.031)。 DH(p = 0.007),DH频率(p = 0.016),DH长度(p = 0.005)和错过的剂量显着增加了病毒载量'斑点'(> 50拷贝/ ml)的发生率出勤前几周(p = 0.001)。电子编辑的给药历史数据的反馈可提高对HAART治疗的依从性,并且似乎是减少病毒载量“斑点”发生率的有效干预措施。将提供进一步的结果,包括对问卷的分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号