【2h】

Late presenters: what can we do?

机译:后期主持人:我们该怎么办?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Late presentation represents a major problem for patients with HIV infection. Actually, it should be made a distinction between late testers and late presenters since the strategies to reduce the percentage of these two groups of subjects could be different. Indeed, the first population is represented by individuals unaware of their serological status, while in the second case the problem is related to engagement and retention in care. Concerning the first population, it has been shown that most of the patients had been seen by their family doctor or admitted to hospital during the year before HIV diagnosis. Indeed, this is a relevant problem, and new strategies to increase the level of suspicion of HIV infection among doctors who are non-HIV specialists are needed, as testing in presence of indicator diseases, should be applied. Concerning the population of late presenters, American data showed a percentage of engagement in care ranging between 50 and 59%. These low percentages could be due to the American Health System, while in a public health system setting, the percentage of patients not engaged in care or lost to follow-up could be lower, even if still relevant. Another important factor that should be considered in both populations is stigma. Indeed, many patients that present late, either late testers or late presenters, are immigrants and have important cultural barriers to disclose their HIV serostatus to family members and friends. Obviously, all subjects unaware or refusing their HIV infection could potentially infect their partners. In conclusion, all efforts should be made to reduce the phenomenon of late presentation since these two populations represent an epidemiological problem not only for the prognosis of the single patient but also for the treatment as prevention strategy.
机译:迟到表示艾滋病毒感染患者的主要问题。实际上,应该区分迟到的测试者和迟到的演示者,因为减少这两组对象的百分比的策略可能不同。确实,第一个人群由不了解其血清状况的个人代表,而在第二个案例中,问题与护理的参与和保留有关。关于第一个人群,事实证明,大多数患者在HIV诊断之前的一年中已经由家庭医生看过或住院。确实,这是一个相关的问题,需要采用新的策略来提高非HIV专家医生对HIV感染的怀疑程度,因为应该采用存在指示性疾病的检测方法。关于后期报告者的人数,美国数据显示参与护理的百分比在50%至59%之间。这些较低的百分比可能是由于美国卫生系统造成的,而在公共卫生系统的环境中,即使仍然有意义,未从事护理或失去随访的患者所占的百分比可能会更低。两种人群都应考虑的另一个重要因素是耻辱感。的确,许多迟到的患者,无论是迟到的测试者还是迟到的演示者,都是移民,并且具有重要的文化障碍,无法向家人和朋友透露自己的HIV血清状况。显然,所有不知道或拒绝其HIV感染的受试者都可能感染其伴侣。总之,应尽一切努力减少迟发现象,因为这两个人群不仅代表单个患者的预后,而且作为预防策略的治疗都代表着流行病学问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号