首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Drugs in RD >The Effect of Budesonide/Formoterol Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler on Predefined Criteria for Worsening Asthma in Four Different Patient Populations with Asthma
【2h】

The Effect of Budesonide/Formoterol Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler on Predefined Criteria for Worsening Asthma in Four Different Patient Populations with Asthma

机译:布地奈德/福莫特罗加压定量吸入器对四种不同哮喘患者哮喘恶化的预定标准的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background Previous studies have shown disparities between Black and Hispanic patients compared with other populations in response to asthma medications.>Objective: The aim of this analysis was to assess the effect of budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler (BUD/FM pMDI) and BUD on predefined criteria for asthma worsening, an asthma control metric generally aligned with definitions of moderate asthma exacerbations, across four different populations.>Methods: Data were from four 12-week, randomized, double-blind,US studies of BUD/FM pMDI treatment in patients aged 12 years or older with varying asthma severities and of varying races. Predefined asthma events and withdrawals due to predefined events were assessed as secondary study endpoints. Study I () includes data from predominantly White patients with mild to moderate asthma who were randomized to BUD/FM pMDI 160/9 μg twice daily (bid; n = 123) or BUDpMDI 160 μg bid (n = 121). Study II () includes data from predominantly White patients withmoderate to severe asthma who were randomized to BUD/FM pMDI 320/9 μg bid (n = 124) or BUD pMDI 320 μg bid (n = 109). Study III () included self-reported Black patients with moderate to severe asthma who were randomized to BUD/FM pMDI 320/9 μg bid (n = 153) or BUD dry powder inhaler 360 μg bid (n = 148). Study IV () included self-reported Hispanic patients with moderate to severe asthma who were randomized to BUD/FM pMDI 320/9 μg bid (n = 127) or BUD pMDI 320 μg bid (n = 123). Patients were to be withdrawn from the studies if they developed an asthma event, as determined by predefined criteria, except for night-time awakenings, where withdrawal was left to the study physician’s judgment.>Results: Overall, fewer patients in the studies (study I, II, III, and IV, respectively) experienced ≧1 asthma event in the BUD/FM group (18.7%, 29.8%, 37.3%, 25.2%) versus the BUD group (21.5%, 44.0%, 45.3%, 31.7%); only study II results showed a statistically significant difference between treatments. Fewer patients with moderate to severe asthma (studies II, III, and IV) were withdrawn due to ≧1 asthma event in the BUD/FM group (10.5%, 11.8%, 3.1%, respectively) than in the BUD group (20.2%, 18.9%, 6.5%, respectively); however, percentages were similar in the BUD/FM (7.3%) and BUD (6.6%) groups in patients with mild to moderate asthma (study I).>Conclusions: Predefined asthma event rates were numerically or significantly lower for patients with asthma receiving BUD/FMpMDI versusBUD, regardless of race or disease severity. Differences between the BUD/FM pMDI and BUD groupswere smaller in patients with mild to moderate asthma than in those with moderate to severe asthma, most likely because patients with milder disease had lower asthma event rates. Overall, these findings support the efficacy of BUD/FM pMDI in achieving asthma control in patients with moderate to severe asthma.
机译:>背景先前的研究表明,黑人和西班牙裔患者与其他人群相比,对哮喘药物的反应存在差异。>目的:该分析的目的是评估布地奈德/福莫特罗加压定量吸入器(BUD / FM pMDI)和BUD符合预先确定的哮喘恶化标准,这是一种哮喘控制指标,与四个不同人群的中度哮喘急性发作定义一致。>方法:来自四项为期12周,随机,双盲,美国的BUD / FM pMDI治疗对12岁或12岁以上哮喘严重程度不同且种族不同的患者的研究。预定义的哮喘事件和因预定义的事件引起的戒断被视为次要研究终点。研究I()包括来自以轻度至中度哮喘为主的白人患者的数据,这些患者被随机分为BUD / FM pMDI 160/9μg每日两次(出价; n = 123)或BUDpMDI 160μgbid(n = 121)。研究II()包括以白人为主的中度至重度哮喘患者的数据,这些患者被随机分配到BUD / FM pMDI 320/9μgbid(n = 124)或BUD pMDI 320μgbid(n = 109)。研究III()包括自我报告的中度至重度哮喘的黑人患者,他们随机分为BUD / FM pMDI 320/9μgbid(n = 153)或BUD干粉吸入器360μgbid(n = 148)。研究IV()包括自我报告的中度至重度哮喘的西班牙裔患者,他们随机分为BUD / FM pMDI 320/9μgbid(n = 127)或BUD pMDI 320μgbid(n = 123)。如果患者按照预先定义的标准发展为哮喘事件,则应从研究中退出,除非夜间醒来由研究医师判断,这是夜间醒来的结果。>结果:与BUD组(21.5%,44.0)相比,BUD / FM组(分别为I,II,III和IV研究)的患者经历了≥1次哮喘事件(18.7%,29.8%,37.3%,25.2%) %,45.3%,31.7%);只有研究II的结果显示治疗之间的统计学差异。在BUD / FM组中,因≥1个哮喘事件而退出中度至重度哮喘的患者(研究II,III和IV)的比例比BUD组中的少(分别为10.5%,11.8%,3.1%) ,分别为18.9%和6.5%);然而,在轻度至中度哮喘患者中,BUD / FM(7.3%)和BUD(6.6%)组的百分比相似(研究I)。>结论:预先确定的哮喘事件发生率在数字上或显着上无论种族或疾病的严重程度如何,接受BUD / FMpMDI相对于BUD的哮喘患者均降低。轻度至中度哮喘患者的BUD / FM pMDI与BUD组之间的差异较小,而中度至重度哮喘患者之间的差异较小,这很可能是因为轻度疾病患者的哮喘发生率较低。总体而言,这些发现支持BUD / FM pMDI在中度至重度哮喘患者中实现哮喘控制的功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号