首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Immunity Inflammation and Disease >Skin prick test reactivity to lupin in comparison to peanut pea and soybean in atopic and non-atopic German subjects: A preliminary cross-sectional study
【2h】

Skin prick test reactivity to lupin in comparison to peanut pea and soybean in atopic and non-atopic German subjects: A preliminary cross-sectional study

机译:在特应性和非特应性德国受试者中与花生豌豆和大豆相比皮肤点刺试验对羽扇豆的反应性:初步的横断面研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The increasing use of lupin in food processing poses a problem of potential (cross-)allergic reactions. To evaluate the prevalence of sensitization to lupin in comparison to that of other legumes skin prick tests were performed with lupin, pea, peanut, and soybean in atopic (n = 81) and non-atopic (n = 102) German adults. Of these 183 subjects, 20 subjects had to be excluded due to invalid skin prick tests (reaction to histamine <3 mm or to sodium chloride >2 mm). Thus, skin prick tests of 163 subjects were included in final analyses. Of 163 subjects, 18 had a positive reaction to at least one legume tested. Overall skin prick test reactivity was different among non-atopic and atopic subjects (P = 0.005). Altogether, six subjects (4%) were sensitized to lupin, 12 (7%) to pea, 5 (3%) to peanut, and 8 (5%) to soybean. Two (2%) of the 92 non-atopic subjects and 4 (6%) of the 71 atopic subjects had a positive skin prick test to lupin. Of the 6 subjects sensitized to lupin, 3 (50%) were also sensitized to pea, 3 (50%) to peanut, and 5 (83%) to soybean. In conclusion, the prevalence rates of lupin sensitization were comparable to or even lower than those of pea, peanut, and soybean. To date, lupin allergy is suspected to be relatively uncommon in the overall German population since lupin sensitization occurred in only 2% of non-atopic subjects. However, there is a clear risk of a lupin allergy in predisposed subjects, since the frequency of lupin sensitization was 6% in atopic subjects. In particular, subjects with existing sensitization or allergy to other legumes are at higher risk for a sensitization or allergy to lupin due to cross-reactivity.
机译:羽扇豆在食品加工中的使用日益增加带来了潜在的(交叉)过敏反应问题。为了评估对羽扇豆过敏的患病率,与其他豆类相比,对羽扇豆,豌豆,花生和大豆进行过敏性皮疹试验(n = 81)和非过敏性(n = 102)德国成年人。在这183名受试者中,有20名受试者由于无效的皮肤点刺试验(对组胺<3 mm或对氯化钠> 2 mm的反应)而被排除在外。因此,最终分析中包括了163名受试者的皮肤点刺试验。在163名受试者中,有18名对至少一种受检豆科植物呈阳性反应。非特应性和特应性受试者之间的总体皮肤点刺试验反应性不同(P = 0.005)。总共有6名受试者(4%)对羽扇豆,12(7%)对豌豆,5(3%)对花生,8(5%)对大豆敏感。 92名非特应性受试者中有2名(2%)和71名特应性受试者中有4名(6%)的皮肤rick测试呈阳性。在对羽扇豆敏感的6位受试者中,有3位(50%)对豌豆也敏感,有3位(50%)对花生敏感,还有5位(83%)对大豆敏感。总之,羽扇豆致敏的患病率与豌豆,花生和大豆的患病率相当甚至更低。迄今为止,人们怀疑羽扇豆过敏在整个德国人口中相对较少见,因为仅2%的非特应性受试者发生了羽扇豆过敏。然而,由于易感者的羽扇豆敏化频率为6%,因此在易感人群中存在羽扇豆过敏的明显风险。特别地,由于交叉反应性,对其他豆类已有过敏或过敏症的受试者对羽扇豆过敏或过敏的风险较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号