首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Medicine >Fatigue in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib on an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule in a randomized phase II trial
【2h】

Fatigue in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib on an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule in a randomized phase II trial

机译:一项随机II期试验以间歇或连续给药方案接受舒尼替尼治疗的晚期肾细胞癌患者的疲劳

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A phase II trial in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) found no benefit in efficacy or safety between patients receiving oral sunitinib 50 mg/day for 4 weeks followed by 2-week off-treatment (Schedule 4/2) and those receiving 37.5 mg continuous daily sunitinib. We hypothesized that fatigue would have a more variable “on-off” effect with the 4/2 schedule. A total of 292 patients completed two fatigue-related items on Days 1 and 29 of each treatment cycle. Mean absolute slopes were compared across treatments. A planned analysis of item “I feel fatigued” demonstrated that the mean absolute slope was greater in Schedule 4/2 compared to continuous dosing (0.042 vs. 0.032, P = 0.003), and analysis based on the change from Day 1 to Day 29 (0.52 vs. 0.21, P = 0.002) and, separately, Day 29 to the next Day 1 (−0.38 vs. −0.05, P < 0.001) showed the changes to be significantly larger in Schedule 4/2 than continuous dosing. “I have a lack of energy” showed a similar pattern graphically, however, the planned analysis was not statistically significant based on the absolute slopes but was when Day 1 to Day 29 and Day 29 to Day 1 changes were analyzed separately. The 4/2 arm was associated with a greater degree of variability in fatigue reflecting a possible “on-off” effect whereby patients receiving the 4/2 schedule reported less fatigue at the beginning of each cycle compared to Day 29. The findings can inform care for individuals with advanced RCC receiving intermittent dosing of sunitinib.
机译:一项晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)的II期临床试验发现,口服50毫克/日的舒尼替尼治疗4周,随后2周停药治疗的患者(附表4/2)与37.5毫克的口服口服舒尼替尼治疗之间的疗效或安全性均无益处连续每日舒尼替尼。我们假设在4/2计划中疲劳会产生更多的“开-关”效应。共有292位患者在每个治疗周期的第1天和第29天完成了两项与疲劳相关的项目。比较各处理之间的平均绝对斜率。对项目“我感到疲倦”的计划分析表明,与连续给药相比,附表4/2中的平均绝对斜率更大(0.042对0.032,P = 0.003),并且分析基于第1天到第29天的变化(0.52 vs.0.21,P = 0.002),以及分别从第29天到第二天(-0.38 vs.-0.05,P <0.001)显示,与连续给药相比,附表4/2中的变化明显更大。 “我精力不足”以图形方式显示了类似的模式,但是,基于绝对斜率,计划的分析在统计上并不显着,而是分别分析了第1天至第29天和第29天至第1天的变化。 4/2组与更大程度的疲劳变化相关联,反映出可能的“开-关”效应,因此与第29天相比,接受4/2方案的患者在每个周期开始时报告的疲劳较少。护理接受间歇性舒尼替尼给药的晚期RCC患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号