首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >Leaf meristems: an easily ignored component of the response to human disturbance in alpine grasslands
【2h】

Leaf meristems: an easily ignored component of the response to human disturbance in alpine grasslands

机译:叶分生组织:高寒草原对人为干扰的响应中一个容易忽略的部分

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Grazing and fencing are two important factors that influence productivity and biomass allocation in alpine grasslands. The relationship between root (R) and shoot (S) biomass and the root:shoot ratio (R/S) are critical parameters for estimating the terrestrial carbon stocks and biomass allocation mechanism responses to human activities. Previous studies have often used the belowground:aboveground biomass ratio (M b/M a) to replace the R/S in alpine ecosystems. However, these studies may have neglected the leaf meristem biomass, which belongs to the shoot but occurs below the soil surface, leading to a significant overestimation of the R/S ratio. We conducted a comparative study to explore the differences between the R/S and M b/M a at both the species (Stipa purpurea, Carex moorcroftii, and Artemisia nanschanica) and community levels on a Tibetan alpine grassland with grazing and fencing management blocks. The results revealed that the use of the M b/M a to express the R/S appeared to overestimate the actual value of the R/S, both at species and community levels. For S. purpurea, the M b/M a was three times higher than the R/S. The M b/M a was approximately two times higher than the R/S for the species of C. moorcroftii and A. nanschanica and at the community level. The relationships between the R‐S and M b‐M a exhibited different slopes for the alpine plants across all the management practices. Compared to the fenced grasslands, the plants in the grazing blocks not only allocated more biomass to the roots but also to the leaf meristems. The present study highlights the contribution of leaf meristems to the accurate assessment of shoot and belowground biomasses. The R/S and M b/M a should be cautiously used in combination in the future research. The understanding of the distinction between the R‐S and M b‐M a may help to improve the biomass allocation mechanism response to human disturbances in an alpine area.
机译:放牧和围栏是影响高山草原生产力和生物量分配的两个重要因素。根(R)和芽(S)生物量之间的关系以及根:枝根比(R / S)是估算陆地碳储量和生物量分配机制对人类活动的响应的关键参数。先前的研究通常使用地下:地下生物量比(M b / M a)代替高山生态系统中的R / S。但是,这些研究可能忽略了叶分生组织生物量,该生物组织属于枝条,但发生在土壤表面以下,导致R / S比的显着高估。我们进行了一项比较研究,以探讨西藏(放牧和围栏管理)高寒草地上该物种(Stipa purpurea,Carex moorcroftii和Artemisia nanschanica)的R / S和M b / M a之间的差异以及群落水平。结果表明,使用M b / M a表示R / S似乎高估了R / S在物种和群落水平上的实际价值。对于紫红色葡萄球菌,M b / M a比R / S高三倍。在社区一级,M b / M a大约是C.moorcroftii和A.nanschanica物种的R / S的两倍。在所有管理实践中,高山植物的RS和 M b- M a之间的关系呈现出不同的斜率。与围栏草原相比,放牧地块的植物不仅为根部分配了更多的生物量,还为叶分生组织分配了更多的生物量。本研究突出了叶分生组织对芽和地下生物量的准确评估的贡献。 R / S和 M b / M a在以后的研究中应谨慎使用。了解R‐S和 M b‐ M a之间的区别可能有助于改善对高寒地区人为干扰的生物量分配机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号