首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>European Journal of Ageing >Validation of abridged mini-mental state examination scales using population-based data from Sweden and USA
【2h】

Validation of abridged mini-mental state examination scales using population-based data from Sweden and USA

机译:使用来自瑞典和美国的基于人口的数据验证简略的轻度心理状态考试量表

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this study is to validate two abridged versions of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE): one intended for use in face-to-face interviews, and the other developed for telephonic interviews, using data from Sweden and the US to validate the abridged scales against dementia diagnoses as well as to compare their performance to that of the full MMSE scale. The abridged versions were based on eight domains from the original MMSE scale. The domains included in the MMSE-SF were registration, orientation, delayed recall, attention, and visual spatial ability. In the MMSE-SF-C, the visual spatial ability item was excluded, and instead, one additional orientation item was added. There were 794 participants from the Swedish HARMONY study [mean age 81.8 (4.8); the proportion of cognitively impaired was 51 %] and 576 participants from the US ADAMS study [mean age 83.2 (5.7); the proportion of cognitively impaired was 65 %] where it was possible to compare abridged MMSE scales to dementia diagnoses and to the full MMSE scale. We estimated the sensitivity and specificity levels of the abridged tests, using clinical diagnoses as reference. Analyses with both the HARMONY and the ADAMS data indicated comparable levels of sensitivity and specificity in detecting cognitive impairment for the two abridged scales relative to the full MMSE. Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that the two abridged scales corresponded well to those of the full MMSE. The two abridged tests have adequate validity and correspond well with the full MMSE. The abridged versions could therefore be alternatives to consider in larger population studies where interview length is restricted, and the respondent burden is high.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10433-016-0394-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:这项研究的目的是验证两种精简版的迷你精神状态检查(MMSE):一种打算用于面对面访谈,另一种旨在通过电话访谈,使用瑞典和美国的数据验证针对痴呆症诊断的简化量表,并将其表现与完整的MMSE量表进行比较。删节版基于原始MMSE量表的八个域。 MMSE-SF中包括的领域是配准,方向,延迟回忆,注意力和视觉空间能力。在MMSE-SF-C中,视觉空间能力项目被排除,而是添加了一个附加的定向项目。瑞典HARMONY研究共有794名参与者[平均年龄81.8(4.8);认知障碍的比例为51%],来自美国ADAMS研究的576名参与者[平均年龄83.2(5.7);认知障碍的比例为65%],可以比较删减的MMSE量表与痴呆症的诊断和完整的MMSE量表。我们以临床诊断为参考,估算了简化测试的敏感性和特异性水平。使用HARMONY和ADAMS数据进行的分析表明,相对于完整的MMSE,在两个简化量表中检测认知障碍的敏感性和特异性水平相当。接收器的工作特性曲线表明,这两个简化的尺度与整个MMSE的尺度非常吻合。两项简化的测试具有足够的有效性,并且与完整的MMSE相符。因此,在访谈时间受到限制且受访者负担高的较大人群研究中,可以使用删节版作为替代方案。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s10433-016-0394-z)包含补充材料,可供授权用户使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号