首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >Estimating mortality rates among passerines caught for ringing with mist nets using data from previously ringed birds
【2h】

Estimating mortality rates among passerines caught for ringing with mist nets using data from previously ringed birds

机译:使用以前被打过圈的鸟的数据估算被雾网打成圈的雀形目鸟的死亡率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Mist netting is the most commonly used method for catching birds for scientific ringing, but despite decades of use, there have been few attempts to quantify the associated potential risks to the individuals caught. Any incidence of mortality through capture and handling, however low, is of potential ethical concern and may also introduce biases into the data. We estimate the mortality rate associated with capture of previously ringed (recaptured) passerines from the British and Irish Ringing Scheme (c. 1.5 million records) caught using mist nets. The importance of species, age, mass, month, time, previous captures, and an index of predator occurrence was tested using generalized linear mixed‐effects models. The average mortality rate was 0.0011, most of which was reported to occur before the individuals had been extracted from the nets (c. 70% of incidents). Juveniles appeared to be at higher risk and the incidence of predation from mist nets was seasonal, with increased risk during the winter. Species differed in their reported mortality rates with the apparent risk being greatest for Chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita (0.0029) and Bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula (0.0027). To improve our understanding (and hence minimize risk in future), we recommend collecting more complete data on incidences of mortality, and also injuries; exercising increased care when the species we have identified as being at greater risk are likely to be captured, and ensuring there are robust procedures for the checking of nets (as most reported incidents of mortality occur before handling). We also recommend that all Ringing Schemes should collate and make available data on capture‐related mortality. Overall rates of mortality associated with capture, although, were low and support the use of mist netting as a safe capture technique, without undue bias from mortality, when used by appropriately trained individuals.
机译:薄雾网捕是捕捉鸟以进行科学敲响的最常用方法,但是尽管使用了数十年,但仍很少尝试量化被捕人员的相关潜在风险。任何通过捕获和处理而导致的死亡发生率,无论多么低,都可能引起道德上的关注,并且也可能给数据带来偏差。我们估计与使用雾网捕获的英国和爱尔兰振铃计划(约150万条记录)捕获先前振铃(重新捕获)的雀形目有关的死亡率。使用广义线性混合效应模型测试了物种,年龄,质量,月份,时间,以前的捕获以及捕食者发生的指数的重要性。平均死亡率为0.0011,据报告其中大多数发生在从网中提取个人之前(约占事故的70%)。少年似乎处于较高的风险中,薄雾网捕食的发生是季节性的,冬季的风险增加。物种的报告死亡率不同,Chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita(0.0029)和Bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula(0.0027)的表观风险最大。为了提高我们的理解(从而使将来的风险降到最低),我们建议收集关于死亡和伤害发生率的更完整的数据;当我们已经识别出面临更大风险的物种很可能被捕获时,应加倍小心,并确保有健全的程序来检查网(因为大多数报道的死亡事件发生在处理之前)。我们还建议所有振铃计划都应整理并提供与捕获有关的死亡率的数据。但是,与捕获有关的总死亡率很低,并且当受过适当训练的人使用时,支持使用薄雾网作为一种安全的捕获技术,而不会造成死亡率的不当偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号