首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Thorax >Survival in patients with class III idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with first line oral bosentan compared with an historical cohort of patients started on intravenous epoprostenol
【2h】

Survival in patients with class III idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with first line oral bosentan compared with an historical cohort of patients started on intravenous epoprostenol

机译:一线口服波生坦治疗的III级特发性肺动脉高压患者的生存率与静脉内使用依泊汀的历史患者队列比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: The oral dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan improves exercise capacity and delays clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, but its use could delay starting intravenous epoprostenol, a life saving treatment. >Methods: Survival in patients with functional class III idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treated with bosentan in clinical trials was compared with historical data from similar patients treated with epoprostenol in the clinic. Statistical methods were used to adjust for possible underlying differences between the two groups. >Results: Baseline factors for the 139 patients treated with bosentan and the 346 treated with epoprostenol suggested that the epoprostenol cohort had more severe disease—that is, a lower cardiac index (2.01 v 2.39 l/min/m2) and higher pressures and resistance. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates after 1 and 2 years were 97% and 91%, respectively, in the bosentan cohort and 91% and 84% in the epoprostenol cohort. Cox regression analyses adjusting for differences in baseline factors showed a greater probability of death in the epoprostenol cohort (hazard ratio 2.2 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 4.0) in the model adjusted for haemodynamics). Alternative regression analyses and analyses to adjust for different data collection dates gave consistently similar results. When matched cohorts of 83 patients each were selected, survival estimates were similar. In the bosentan cohort 87% and 75% of patients followed for 1 and 2 years, respectively, remained on monotherapy. >Conclusions: No evidence was found to suggest that initial treatment with oral bosentan, followed by or with the addition of other treatment if needed, adversely affected the long term outcome compared with initial intravenous epoprostenol in patients with class III idiopathic PAH.
机译:>背景:口服双重内皮素受体拮抗剂波生坦可提高运动能力并延缓肺动脉高压患者的临床恶化,但使用该药可能会延迟开始静脉挽救依托泊汀,这是一种挽救生命的治疗方法。 >方法:将在临床试验中用波生坦治疗的功能性III级特发性肺动脉高压(PAH)患者的生存与在临床中使用依普列汀治疗的类似患者的历史数据进行比较。统计方法用于调整两组之间潜在的潜在差异。 >结果:接受波生坦治疗的139例患者和依泊汀的346例患者的基线因素表明,依泊汀组的疾病更为严重,即心脏指数较低(2.01 v 2.39 l / min / m 2 )和更高的压力和阻力。波森坦研究组1年和2年后的Kaplan-Meier生存率估计分别为97%和91%,依泊美汀组为91%和84%。校正基线因素差异的Cox回归分析显示,依泊度醇组有更大的死亡可能性(在针对血流动力学进行调整的模型中,危险比2.2(95%置信区间1.2至4.0))。替代回归分析和针对不同数据收集日期进行调整的分析得出的结果始终如一。当选择每人83例患者的配对队列时,生存估计相似。在波生坦队列中,分别接受了1年和2年随访的患者分别为87%和75%。 >结论:没有发现证据表明,与口服静脉注射依泊妥烯醇相比,口服波生坦的初始治疗,如果需要的话或在必要时再加其他治疗,与长期静脉使用依泊妥烯醇相比,对长期疗效有不利影响特发性PAH。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号