首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics >The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator
【2h】

The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator

机译:Elekta VersaHD直线加速器上的摩纳哥治疗计划系统的调试和验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Accurate beam modeling is essential to help ensure overall accuracy in the radiotherapy process. This study describes our experience with beam model validation of a Monaco treatment planning system on a Versa HD linear accelerator. Data were collected such that Monaco beam models could be generated using three algorithms: collapsed cone (CC) and photon Monte Carlo (MC) for photon beams, and electron Monte Carlo (eMC) for electron beams. Validations are performed on measured percent depth doses (PDDs) and profiles, for open‐field point‐doses in homogenous and heterogeneous media, and for obliquely incident electron beams. Gamma analysis is used to assess the agreement between calculation and measurement for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, including volumetric modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiation therapy (VMAT SBRT). For all relevant conditions, gamma index values below 1 are obtained when comparing Monaco calculated PDDs and profiles with measured data. Point‐doses in a water medium are found to be within 2% agreement of commissioning data in 99.5% and 98.6% of the points computed by MC and CC, respectively. All point‐dose calculations for the eMC algorithm in water are within 4% agreement of measurement, and 92% of measurements are within 3%. In heterogeneous media of air and cortical bone, both CC and MC yielded better than 3% agreement with ion chamber measurements. eMC yielded 3% agreement to measurement downstream of air with oblique beams of up to 27°, 5% agreement distal to bone, and within 4% agreement at extended source to surface distance (SSD) for all electron energies except 6 MeV. The 6‐MeV point of measurement is on a steep dose gradient which may impact the magnitude of discrepancy measured. The average gamma passing rate for style="fixed-case">IMRT/ style="fixed-case">VMAT plans is 96.9% (±2.1%) and 98.0% (±1.9%) for style="fixed-case">VMAT SBRT when evaluated using 3%/2 mm criteria. Monaco beam models for the Versa style="fixed-case">HD linac were successfully commissioned for clinical use.
机译:准确的光束建模对于帮助确保放射治疗过程的整体准确性至关重要。这项研究描述了我们在Versa HD线性加速器上对摩纳哥治疗计划系统进行光束模型验证的经验。收集数据使得可以使用三种算法生成摩纳哥束模型:对于光子束,使用折叠锥(CC)和光子蒙特卡洛(MC),对于电子束,使用电子蒙特卡洛(eMC)。对均匀和非均匀介质中的开放场点剂量以及倾斜入射电子束的实测百分比深度剂量(PDD)和分布图进行验证。伽马分析用于评估强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)和体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)计划(包括用于立体定向放射治疗(VMAT SBRT)的体积调制电弧治疗)的计算和测量之间的一致性。对于所有相关条件,将摩纳哥计算得出的PDD和分布图与测量数据进行比较,可获得低于1的伽玛指数值。发现水介质中的点剂量分别在MC和CC计算的点的99.5%和98.6%的调试数据的2%范围内。水中eMC算法的所有点剂量计算均在测量结果的4%之内,而92%的测量结果在3%之内。在空气和皮质骨的异质介质中,CC和MC的离子室测量结果均优于3%。对于6兆电子伏特以外的所有电子能量,eMC产生的高达27%的倾斜光束在空气下游进行测量的一致性为3%,在骨远端的一致性为5%,并且在扩展的源到表面距离(SSD)范围内的一致性在4%以内。 6 MeV的测量点位于陡峭的剂量梯度上,这可能会影响所测量的差异幅度。 style =“ fixed-case”> IMRT / style =“ fixed-case”> VMAT 计划的平均伽玛通过率分别为96.9%(±2.1%)和98.0%(使用3%/ 2毫米标准进行评估时, style =“ fixed-case”> VMAT SBRT 的精度为±1.9%)。 Versa style =“ fixed-case”> HD 直线加速器的摩纳哥光束模型已成功投入临床使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号