首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Translational Behavioral Medicine >The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations
【2h】

The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations

机译:SNAP-Ed评估框架:展示预防肥胖的国家框架对低收入人群的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The United States Department of Agriculture’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education, known as SNAP-Ed, is the country’s largest and most diverse community nutrition program. In 2017, nearly 140 SNAP-Ed implementing agencies (SIAs) and hundreds of contractors delivered nutrition education to almost 5 million people in nearly 60,000 low-resource sites. Millions more were impacted with social marketing campaigns and policy, systems, and environmental changes. This article introduces and describes the benefits of the newly developed SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework (Framework) and companion Interpretive Guide to consistently measure SNAP-Ed outcomes across different settings. The Framework uses the social ecological model as its underlying theory and features 51 indicators across four levels: Individual, Environmental Supports, Sectors of Influence, and Population Results. Topline findings from the first-year Census to track Framework adoption found that most SIAs intended to impact indicators closer to the inner levels of influence: Individual (mean = 59% of SIAs; SD = 22%) and Environmental Settings (mean = 48%; SD = 23%). As yet, few SIAs targeted outcomes for long-term indicators (mean = 26%; SD = 15%), Sectors of Influence (mean = 20%; SD = 12%), or Population Results (mean = 30%; SD = 11%). An in-depth example of how one state is using the Framework is described. The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework offers a new suite of evaluation measures toward eliminating disparities that contribute to poor diet, physical inactivity, food insecurity and obesity. Practitioners will need technical assistance to implement the Framework, especially to measure longer-term, multi-sector and population results, and to maximize effectiveness in SNAP-Ed.
机译:美国农业部的补充营养援助计划教育(SNAP-Ed)是美国规模最大,种类最多的社区营养计划。 2017年,近140个SNAP-Ed执行机构(SIA)和数百个承包商为近60,000个低资源站点的近500万人提供了营养教育。数以百万计的人受到了社会营销活动以及政策,系统和环境变化的影响。本文介绍并描述了新开发的SNAP-Ed评估框架(框架)和随附的解释性指南的优点,该指南可在不同环境中一致地测量SNAP-Ed结果。该框架使用社会生态模型作为基础理论,并在四个层次上具有51个指标:个人,环境支持,影响部门和人口结果。跟踪框架采用情况的第一年人口普查的主要调查结果发现,大多数SIA旨在影响指标更接近内部影响水平:个人(平均值= SIA的59%; SD = 22%)和环境设置(平均值= 48%) ; SD = 23%)。到目前为止,很少有SIA将结果作为长期指标(平均值= 26%; SD = 15%),影响部门(平均值= 20%; SD = 12%)或总体结果(平均值= 30%; SD = 11%)。描述了一个状态如何使用框架的深入示例。 SNAP-Ed评估框架提供了一套新的评估措施,以消除导致饮食不良,缺乏运动,食物不安全和肥胖的差异。从业人员将需要技术援助来实施框架,尤其是衡量长期,多部门和人口的成果,并最大程度地提高SNAP-Ed的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号