首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Molecular and Clinical Oncology >Advantages of CyberKnife for inoperable stage I peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy
【2h】

Advantages of CyberKnife for inoperable stage I peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

机译:与三维保形放射疗法相比Cyber​​Knife治疗无法手术的I期末期非小细胞肺癌的优势

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study was conducted to compare the clinical curative effect and acute radiation lung reactions between CyberKnife (CK) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) treatment for inoperable stage I peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively analyzed 68 patients with inoperable stage I peripheral NSCLC between 2012 and 2013 in our institution. The CK patients were treated with 42–60 Gy in three fractions, while the 3DCRT patients were treated with a total of 60 Gy, at 2 Gy per fraction. The patients were followed up and the clinical outcome was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. We assessed the presence of acute radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary function status by thoracic scan and pulmonary function tests following CK and 3DCRT treatment. The binary univariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that treatment method and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) prior to treatment (pre-FEV1/FVC) were the main factors affecting the risk of radiation pneumonitis. The analysis of these factors through multivariate logistic regression method demonstrated that treatment method for grade 1 and 2 [odds ratio (OR)= 7.866 and 11.334, respectively) and pre-FEV1/FVC for grade 1, 2 and 3 (OR = 5.062, 11.498 and 15.042, respectively) were significant factors affecting the risk of radiation pneumonitis (P<0.05). The 68 patients were divided into two subgroups using the threshold of pre-FEV1/FVC selected by the receiver operating characteristic curve. There were significant differences between the 3DCRT and CK treatment in both the pre-FEV1/FVC <68% and ≥68% subgroups for radiation pneumonitis (P=0.023 and 0.002, respectively). There was no statistically significant change in FVC, FEV1 and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DCLO) in the CK group, whereas there was a decrease in DCLO in the 3DCRT group. The complete remission rate was 40 vs. 34.2% at 1 year in the CK and 3DCRT groups, respectively. In conclusion, in this cohort of patients with inoperable stage I peripheral NSCLC, CK appears to be a safe and superior alternative to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy.
机译:进行这项研究的目的是比较射波刀(CK)和三维适形放疗(3DCRT)治疗无法手术的I期外周非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效和急性放射肺反应。我们回顾性分析了我院2012年至2013年间68例不能手术的I期末期NSCLC患者。 CK患者分三部分接受42-60 Gy的治疗,而3DCRT患者共接受60 Gy治疗,每部分2 Gy。对患者进行随访,并根据《实体瘤反应评估标准》对临床结果进行评估。我们通过CK和3DCRT治疗后的胸部扫描和肺功能测试评估了急性放射性肺炎和肺功能状态的存在。二元单因素logistic回归分析表明,治疗方法和治疗前(FEV1 / FVC之前)1秒/强制肺活量(FEV1 / FVC)中的强制呼气量是影响放射性肺炎风险的主要因素。通过多元logistic回归方法对这些因素进行分析,结果表明,1级和2级的治疗方法[比值比(OR)分别为7.866和11.334),FEV1 / FVC之前的治疗方法分别为1级,2级和3级(OR = 5.062,分别是11.498和15.042)是影响放射性肺炎风险的重要因素(P <0.05)。使用由受试者工作特征曲线选择的前FEV1 / FVC阈值将68例患者分为两个亚组。在FEV1 / FVC之前的<68%和≥68%的放射性肺炎亚组中,3DCRT和CK治疗之间存在显着差异(分别为P = 0.023和0.002)。 CK组的FVC,FEV1和一氧化碳扩散能力(DCLO)没有统计学上的显着变化,而3DCRT组的DCLO却有下降。 CK和3DCRT组的完全缓解率分别为40%和1年的34.2%。总之,在这一人群中,I期外周血非小细胞肺癌无法手术的患者,CK似乎是常规分次放疗的安全且优越的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号