首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Public Health Ethics >Towards an Integration of PrEP into a Safe Sex Ethics Framework for Men Who Have Sex with Men
【2h】

Towards an Integration of PrEP into a Safe Sex Ethics Framework for Men Who Have Sex with Men

机译:致力于将PrEP纳入与男性发生性关系的男性安全性道德伦理框架中

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The ethics of safe sex in the gay community has, for many years, been focused on debates surrounding the responsibility (or lack thereof) regarding the use of condoms to prevent HIV transmission, once the only tool available. With the development of Truvada as a pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV, for the first time in the history of the HIV/AIDS epidemic there is the potential to significantly reduce the risk of HIV transmission during sex without the use of condoms (without taking into consideration ‘treatment as prevention’ with HIV-positive people). The introduction of PrEP necessitates a renewed discussion about the politics and ethics of safe sex for men who have sex with men (MSM). We present the arguments of authors who hold radically opposite positions with regard to the ethics of condom use by gay men, but who currently both criticize the use of PrEP. We offer a critique of their arguments and advance the position that the use of PrEP, even without condoms, can be acceptable and part of a safe sex ethics framework for MSM.
机译:同性恋社区中安全性行为的道德观念多年来一直集中在围绕使用避孕套防止艾滋病毒传播的责任(或缺乏责任)的辩论上,这是唯一可用的工具。随着特鲁瓦达(Truvada)作为HIV的暴露前预防(PrEP)的发展,在HIV / AIDS流行史上首次有可能显着降低不使用安全套的情况下性传播艾滋病毒的风险(而不考虑对艾滋病毒呈阳性的人进行“预防性治疗”)。 PrEP的引入需要重新讨论与男男性接触者(MSM)的安全性行为的政治和道德观念。我们提出的作者的论点在男同性恋者使用安全套的道德观念上截然相反,但他们目前都批评使用PrEP。我们对他们的论点提出了批评,并提出了这样的立场,即即使没有避孕套,使用PrEP也是可以接受的,并且是MSM安全性道德规范框架的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号