首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Molecular and Clinical Oncology >Prediction of survival benefit when deciding between chemotherapy and best supportive therapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective cohort study
【2h】

Prediction of survival benefit when deciding between chemotherapy and best supportive therapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective cohort study

机译:老年晚期胃癌患者在化学疗法和最佳支持疗法之间做出决定时的生存获益预测:一项回顾性队列研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It remains unclear whether elderly patients (EPs) with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) benefit from chemotherapy. The aim of the present study was to examine the prognostic factors for EPs with AGC in order to generate a prognosis-predicting scoring system. This single-center retrospective study examined consecutive patients with AGC between April 2012 and July 2017. Risk factors for survival in EPs aged ≥75 years were identified using a Cox proportional hazards model, and a prognostic scoring system was generated and retrospectively evaluated to determine its usefulness for predicting patient prognosis. A total of 61 patients were enrolled as EPs (mean age, 81 years) and compared with 80 non-EPs (mean age, 66 years). The median survival time (MST) was significantly longer for non-EPs compared with that for EPs (3.8 vs. 10.1 months, respectively; P=0.0447). Among the EPs, 29 (48%) received chemotherapy and 32 received best supportive care (BSC). A total of 68 non-EPs (85%) received chemotherapy and 12 non-EPs received BSC. Among EPs with AGC, age-adjusted multivariate analysis revealed that performance status (PS), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR)<4, intestinal-type histology and chemotherapy were significant prognostic factors. To predict EPs too frail for chemotherapy prior to treatment, one point was assigned for a PS of 1, diffuse-type histology and NLR≥4, whereas 2 points were assigned for PS≥2, and the point totals for each patient were calculated. A cut-off point of 2 had the best P-value by the log-rank test and was used to divide the patients into low-risk (LoR: Score 0–1) and high-risk (HiR: Score 2–4) groups. The MST of the LoR and HiR groups was 23.6 and 3.6 months, respectively (P<0.001). As regards treatment strategies and risk groups, the LoR chemotherapy group had the best prognosis (P=0.0010), and LoR EPs who were administered chemotherapy had a longer MST (30.3 months) compared with EPs who received BSC (8.7 months). In conclusion, scoring systems using PS, histology and NLR may be useful when considering chemotherapy in EPs with AGC.
机译:尚不清楚老年晚期胃癌(AGC)患者(EPs)是否从化疗中获益。本研究的目的是检查具有AGC的EPs的预后因素,以产生预后预测评分系统。这项单中心回顾性研究对2012年4月至2017年7月期间连续的AGC患者进行了检查。使用Cox比例风险模型确定了≥75岁的EP患者的生存危险因素,并建立了预后评分系统并进行了回顾性评估,以确定其有助于预测患者的预后。共有61例患者入选了EP(平均年龄81岁),并与80例非EP进行了比较(平均年龄66岁)。与非EP相比,非EP的中位生存时间(MST)明显更长(分别为3.8个月和10.1个月; P = 0.0447)。在EP中,有29名(48%)接受了化疗,有32名接受了最佳支持治疗(BSC)。共有68位非EPs(85%)接受了化疗,有12位非EPs接受了BSC。在具有AGC的EP中,年龄校正后的多元分析表明,表现状态(PS),中性白细胞/淋巴细胞比(NLR)<4,肠型组织学和化学疗法是重要的预后因素。为了预测治疗前EP对化学疗法而言太脆弱,将PS分为1点,弥散型组织学和NLR≥4分配1分,而PS≥2分配2分,并计算每位患者的总分。通过对数秩检验,临界点2为最佳P值,用于将患者分为低风险(LoR:0-1分)和高风险(HiR:2-4分)组。 LoR和HiR组的MST分别为23.6和3.6个月(P <0.001)。就治疗策略和风险组而言,LoR化疗组的预后最佳(P = 0.0010),而接受化疗的LoR EP病人的MST(30.3个月)比接受BSC的EP患者(8.7个月)更长。总之,在考虑使用AGC的EP化疗时,使用PS,组织学和NLR评分系统可能会有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号