首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Optimal cardiac strategy based on the history of myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease
【2h】

Optimal cardiac strategy based on the history of myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease

机译:基于2型糖尿病冠心病患者心肌梗死病史的最佳心脏策略

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the cardiac treatment strategy and cardiac event risk in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) based on the history of myocardial infarction. Using Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial data, a Cox proportional hazard model was used for calculating hazard ratios (HRs) for major cardiac events in patients receiving early revascularization or intensive medical therapy. Patients without (n = 1,557) and with myocardial infarction (n = 736) were separately analyzed. In patients without myocardial infarction, risk of major cardiac events was similar for percutaneous coronary intervention and intensive medical therapy groups, whereas it was significantly lower in the coronary artery bypass grafting group than in the intensive medical therapy group (HR: 0.48, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.30–0.76, P = 0.002). Conversely, in patients with myocardial infarction, risk of major cardiac events was significantly higher in the early revascularization group than in the intensive medical therapy group (HR: 1.47, 95%CI: 1.03–2.11, P = 0.03). In type 2 diabetic patients with CAD, benefits of early revascularization were observed only in those without previous myocardial infarction. For patients with previous myocardial infarction, intensive medical therapy exerted superior benefits.
机译:这项研究的目的是根据心肌梗塞的历史评估2型糖尿病冠心病(CAD)患者的心脏治疗策略与心脏事件风险之间的关联。使用“旁路血管成形术血运重建研究2糖尿病”(BARI 2D)试验数据,使用Cox比例风险模型计算接受早期血运重建或强化药物治疗的主要心脏事件的风险比(HRs)。对没有(n = 1557)和有心肌梗塞(n = 736)的患者分别进行了分析。在无心肌梗塞的患者中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和强化药物治疗组的主要心脏事件的风险相似,而在冠状动脉搭桥术组中,其重大心脏事件的风险显着低于强化药物治疗组(HR:0.48,95%置信度区间[95%CI]:0.30-0.76,P = 0.002)。相反,在心肌梗塞患者中,早期血运重建组的主要心脏事件风险明显高于强化药物治疗组(HR:1.47,95%CI:1.03-2.11,P = 0.03)。在患有CAD的2型糖尿病患者中,仅在先前没有心肌梗塞的患者中观察到早期血运重建的益处。对于先前有心肌梗塞的患者,强化药物治疗具有更好的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号