首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classification
【2h】

Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classification

机译:多种标签胸部X射线分类的深度学习方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The increased availability of labeled X-ray image archives (e.g. ChestX-ray14 dataset) has triggered a growing interest in deep learning techniques. To provide better insight into the different approaches, and their applications to chest X-ray classification, we investigate a powerful network architecture in detail: the ResNet-50. Building on prior work in this domain, we consider transfer learning with and without fine-tuning as well as the training of a dedicated X-ray network from scratch. To leverage the high spatial resolution of X-ray data, we also include an extended ResNet-50 architecture, and a network integrating non-image data (patient age, gender and acquisition type) in the classification process. In a concluding experiment, we also investigate multiple ResNet depths (i.e. ResNet-38 and ResNet-101). In a systematic evaluation, using 5-fold re-sampling and a multi-label loss function, we compare the performance of the different approaches for pathology classification by ROC statistics and analyze differences between the classifiers using rank correlation. Overall, we observe a considerable spread in the achieved performance and conclude that the X-ray-specific ResNet-38, integrating non-image data yields the best overall results. Furthermore, class activation maps are used to understand the classification process, and a detailed analysis of the impact of non-image features is provided.
机译:带有标签的X射线图像档案(例如ChestX-ray14数据集)的可用性不断提高,引发了人们对深度学习技术的日益增长的兴趣。为了更好地了解不同的方法及其在胸部X射线分类中的应用,我们详细研究了功能强大的网络体系结构:ResNet-50。在此领域的先前工作的基础上,我们考虑进行或不进行微调的迁移学习,以及从头开始培训专用X射线网络的方法。为了利用X射线数据的高空间分辨率,我们还包括扩展的ResNet-50体系结构以及在分类过程中集成非图像数据(患者年龄,性别和获取类型)的网络。在最后的实验中,我们还研究了多个ResNet深度(即ResNet-38和ResNet-101)。在系统评估中,使用5倍重采样和多标签损失函数,我们通过ROC统计数据比较了病理分类的不同方法的性能,并使用等级相关性分析了分类器之间的差异。总体而言,我们观察到所获得的性能有相当大的差异,并得出结论,集成非图像数据的特定于X射线的ResNet-38产生了最佳的总体结果。此外,使用类别激活图来了解分类过程,并提供了对非图像特征影响的详细分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号