首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices
【2h】

Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices

机译:使用两种基于分段或等效折光率的扫频光学相干层析成像生物特征计的眼球生物学检查和屈光结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study compared the axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), mean anterior corneal radius of curvature (Rm), and postoperative refractive outcomes obtained from two different swept-source optical coherence biometers, the ARGOS (Movu, Nagoya, Japan), which uses the segmental refractive index for each segment, and the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), which uses an equivalent refractive index for the entire eye. One hundred and six eyes of 106 patients with cataracts were included. The refractive outcomes using the Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T formulas were evaluated. The mean AL, CCT, ACD, and Rm differed significantly (P < 0.001) with the IOLMaster 700 (25.22 mm, 559 µm, 3.23 mm, and 7.69 mm) compared with the ARGOS (25.14 mm, 533 µm, 3.33 mm, and 7.66 mm). The mean LTs did not differ significantly. The percentages of eyes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 diopter of the predicted refraction did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). The accuracy of the intraocular lens power calculations was clinically acceptable with both biometers, although the ocular biometry using these two biometers exhibited certain differences.
机译:这项研究比较了通过两种不同的扫掠术获得的轴向长度(AL),中央角膜厚度(CCT),前房深度(ACD),晶状体厚度(LT),平均前角膜曲率半径(Rm)和术后屈光结果。光学相干生物测定仪,ARGOS(日本名古屋市摩夫市)使用每个部分的折光率,以及IOLMaster 700(Carl Zeiss Meditec,德国耶拿)使用整个眼睛的折光率。纳入106例白内障患者的106只眼。使用Barrett Universal II,Haigis,Hoffer Q和SRK / T公式评估屈光结果。与ARGOS(25.14 mm,533 m,3.33 mm和25.14 mm,533,m,3.33 mm和IOLMaster 700(25.22 mm,559μm,3.23 mm和7.69 mm)相比,AL,CCT,ACD和Rm的平均差异显着(P <0.001)。 7.66mm)。 LT的平均值无显着差异。在预测屈光度的±0.50和±1.00屈光度以内的眼睛百分比没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。尽管使用这两种生物测定仪的眼生物测定法表现出一定的差异,但两种生物测定仪在临床上都可以接受人工晶状体屈光力计算的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号