首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Relation between detection rate and inappropriate shocks in single versus dual chamber cardioverter-defibrillator – an analysis from the OPTION trial
【2h】

Relation between detection rate and inappropriate shocks in single versus dual chamber cardioverter-defibrillator – an analysis from the OPTION trial

机译:单腔和双腔心脏除颤器的检出率与不当电击之间的关系– OPTION试验的分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) influences inappropriate shock rates. The aim of the study is to analyse rates of patients with appropriate and inappropriate shocks according to detection zones in the OPTION trial. All patients received dual chamber (DC) ICDs randomly assigned to be programmed either to single chamber (SC) or to DC settings including PARAD+ algorithm. In a post-hoc analysis, rates of patients with inappropriate and appropriate shocks were calculated for shocks triggered at heart rates ≥170 bpm (ventricular tachycardia zone) and at rates ≥200 bpm (ventricular fibrillation zone). In the SC group, higher rates of patients with total and inappropriate shocks were delivered at heart rates ≥170 bpm than at rates ≥200 bpm (total shocks: 21.1% vs. 16.6%; p = 0.002; inappropriate shocks: 7.6% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.016; appropriate shocks: 15.2% vs. 13.5%; p = n.s.). No such differences were observed in the DC group (total shocks: 14.3% vs. 12.6%; p = n.s.; inappropriate shocks: 3.9% vs. 3.6%; p = n.s.; appropriate shocks: 12.2% vs. 10.4%; p = n.s.). The higher frequency of patients with total shocks with SC settings than with DC settings that benefit from PARAD+ was driven by a higher percentage of patients with inappropriate shocks in the VT zone (170–200 bpm) in the SC population.
机译:植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的编程会影响不适当的电击率。该研究的目的是根据OPTION试验中的检测区域来分析有适当和不适当电击的患者的发生率。所有患者均接受随机分配的双室(DC)ICD,以编程为单室(SC)或DC设置,包括PARAD +算法。在事后分析中,针对心率≥170bpm(室性心动过速区)和心率≥200bpm(心室纤颤区)时触发的电击,计算了不适当和适当电击患者的发生率。在SC组中,心率≥170 bpm的患者发生总和不适当电击的比率要高于≥200 bpm的患者(总电击:21.1%vs. 16.6%; p = 0.002;不适当电击:7.6%vs. 4.5%,p = 0.016;适当的冲击:15.2%vs. 13.5%; p = ns)。 DC组未观察到这种差异(总电击:14.3%vs. 12.6%; p = ns;不适当的电击:3.9%vs. 3.6%; p = ns;适当的电击:12.2%vs. 10.4%; p = ns)。在SC人群中,具有SC设置的总电击患者的频率高于受益于PARAD +的DC设置的频率,其原因是VT人群中VT区(170-200 inappropriatebpm)出现不适当电击的患者比例更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号