首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Decompressive craniectomy in the management of intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Decompressive craniectomy in the management of intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:减压颅骨切除术治疗颅脑外伤后颅内高压:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the prognostic value of decompressive craniectomy (DC) in patients with traumatic intracranial hypertension. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Web of Science, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ were searched for eligible studies. Ten studies were included in the systematic review, with four randomized controlled trials involved in the meta-analysis, where compared with medical therapies, DC could significantly reduce mortality rate [risk ratio (RR), 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47–0.74, P < 0.001], lower intracranial pressure (ICP) [mean difference (MD), −2.12 mmHg; 95% CI, −2.81 to −1.43, P < 0.001], decrease the length of ICU stay (MD, −4.63 days; 95% CI, −6.62 to −2.65, P < 0.001) and hospital stay (MD, −14.39 days; 95% CI, −26.00 to −2.78, P = 0.02), but increase complications rate (RR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.31–2.87, P < 0.001). No significant difference was detected for Glasgow Outcome Scale at six months (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.61–1.18, P = 0.33), while in subgroup analysis, early DC would possibly result in improved prognosis (P = 0.04). Results from observational studies supported pooled results except prolonged length of ICU and hospital stay. Conclusively, DC seemed to effectively lower ICP, reduce mortality rate but increase complications rate, while its benefit on functional outcomes was not statistically significant.
机译:我们的目标是进行系统的回顾和荟萃分析,以探讨减压颅骨切除术(DC)在颅内高压症患者中的预后价值。搜索PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane对照试验注册机构,Web of Science(http://clinicaltrials.gov/)以寻找符合条件的研究。系统评价包括10项研究,其中4项纳入荟萃分析的随机对照试验中,与药物治疗相比,DC可以显着降低死亡率[风险比(RR)为0.59; 95%置信区间(CI),0.47-0.74,P 0.001],较低的颅内压(ICP)[平均差异(MD),-2.12mmHg; 95%CI,-2.81至-1.43,P <0.001],缩短了ICU住院时间(MD,-4.63天; 95%CI,-6.62至-2.65,P <0.001)和住院时间(MD,-14.39)天; 95%CI,-26.00至-2.78,P = 0.02),但增加并发症发生率(RR,1.94; 95%CI,1.31-2.87,P <0.001)。在六个月时,格拉斯哥预后量表没有发现显着差异(RR,0.85; 95%CI,0.61-1.18,P = 0.33),而在亚组分析中,早期DC可能会改善预后(P = 0.04)。观察性研究的结果支持合并结果,但ICU时间延长和住院时间较长。结论是,DC似乎有效降低了ICP,降低了死亡率,但增加了并发症的发生率,而DC对功能结局的益处尚无统计学意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号