首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Thorax >Comparison of the efficacy of a demand oxygen delivery system with continuous low flow oxygen in subjects with stable COPD and severe oxygen desaturation on walking.
【2h】

Comparison of the efficacy of a demand oxygen delivery system with continuous low flow oxygen in subjects with stable COPD and severe oxygen desaturation on walking.

机译:在稳定的COPD和行走时严重的氧去饱和的受试者中使用连续低流量供氧的按需供氧系统的功效比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Provision of ambulatory oxygen using an intermittent pulsed flow regulated by a demand oxygen delivery system (DODS) greatly increases the limited supply time of standard portable gaseous cylinders. The efficacy of such a system has not previously been studied during submaximal exercise in subjects with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in whom desaturation is likely to be great and where usage is often most appropriate. METHODS: Fifteen subjects with severe COPD and oxygen desaturation underwent six minute walk tests performed in random order to compare the efficacy of a demand oxygen delivery system (DODS) with continuous flow oxygen. Walk distance, breathlessness, oxygen saturation, resting time, and recovery time (objective and subjective) were recorded and compared for each walk. RESULTS: Breathing continuous oxygen compared with baseline air breathing improved mean walk distance (295 m versus 271 m) and recovery time (47 seconds versus 112 seconds), whilst the lowest recorded saturation (81% versus 74%) and time desaturated below 90% (201 seconds versus 299 seconds) were reduced. When the DODS was compared with air breathing only the walk distance changed (283 m versus 271 m). A comparison of the DODS with continuous oxygen breathing showed the DODS to be less effective at oxygenating subjects with inferior lowest saturation (78% versus 81%), time spent below 90% (284 seconds versus 201 seconds), time to objective recovery (83 seconds versus 47 seconds), and walk distance (283 m versus 295 m). CONCLUSIONS: Neither of the delivery systems was able to prevent desaturation in these subjects. The use of continuous flow oxygen, however, was accompanied by improvements in oxygenation, walk distance, and recovery time compared with air breathing. The DODS produced only a small increase in walk distance without elevation of oxygen saturation, but was inferior to continuous flow oxygen in most of the measured variables when compared directly.
机译:背景:使用由需氧输送系统(DODS)调节的间歇性脉冲流来提供动态氧气,大大增加了标准便携式气瓶的有限供应时间。在严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,进行次最大程度运动时,以前尚未研究过这种系统的功效,在这些患者中,去饱和度可能很高,并且通常最适合使用。方法:对15名严重COPD和氧饱和度降低的受试者进行了6分钟步行测试,以比较需求氧气输送系统(DODS)和连续流动氧气的功效。记录步行距离,呼吸困难,氧饱和度,休息时间和恢复时间(客观和主观),并比较每次步行。结果:与基线空气呼吸相比,呼吸连续氧气改善了平均步行距离(295 m对271 m)和恢复时间(47秒对112秒),而记录的最低饱和度(81%对74%)和去饱和时间低于90% (201秒对299秒)减少了。将DODS与呼吸进行比较时,步行距离仅发生变化(283 m对271 m)。 DODS与连续氧气呼吸的比较显示,对于最低饱和度较低(78%比81%),花费时间低于90%(284秒比201秒),客观恢复时间(83)的受试者,DODS的供氧效果较差。秒和47秒),以及步行距离(283 m和295 m)。结论:两种给药系统均不能防止这些对象的去饱和。但是,与空气呼吸相比,使用连续流动氧气可以改善充氧,步行距离和恢复时间。直接比较时,DODS仅增加了步行距离的少量增加而没有增加氧饱和度,但在大多数测量变量中均不如连续流动氧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号