首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Neoadjuvant therapy in relation to lymphadenectomy and resection margins during surgery for oesophageal cancer
【2h】

Neoadjuvant therapy in relation to lymphadenectomy and resection margins during surgery for oesophageal cancer

机译:新辅助疗法与食管癌手术中的淋巴结清扫术和切除范围有关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Differences in lymph node yield and tumour-involved resection margins comparing neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery with surgery alone for oesophageal cancer are unclear. Patients who underwent oesophageal cancer surgery in Sweden in 1987–2010 were included. Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy were compared with those who underwent surgery alone. Outcomes were the number of examined lymph nodes (main outcome), number metastatic lymph nodes, and resection margin status. Rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs of lymph node yield were calculated by Poisson regression, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of resection margin status by multivariable logistic regression, both adjusted for confounders. Among 1818 patients, 587 (32%) had received neoadjuvant therapy and 1231 (68%) had not. Lymph node yield was lower in the neoadjuvant therapy group (median 6 versus 8; adjusted RR 0.75, 0.73–0.78). Fewer metastatic nodes were identified following neoadjuvant therapy (median 0 versus 1; adjusted RR 0.76, 0.69–0.84). Neoadjuvant therapy associated to decreased risk of tumour-involved resection margins when adjusted for confounders except T-stage (OR 0.52, 0.38–0.70), but the association did not remain after adjustment for T-stage (OR 0.91, 0.64–1.29). Neoadjuvant therapy seems to decrease the lymph node yield and decrease the risk of tumour-involved resection margins by shrinking primary tumour.
机译:目前尚不清楚食管癌的新辅助疗法加手术与单纯手术相比,淋巴结产量和与肿瘤相关的切除切缘的差异尚不清楚。纳入了1987-2010年在瑞典接受食管癌手术的患者。将接受新辅助疗法的患者与仅接受手术的患者进行比较。结果是检查的淋巴结数目(主要结局),转移性淋巴结数目和切除切缘状态。通过泊松回归计算淋巴结产率的比率比(RRs)和95%CIs,通过多变量logistic回归计算切除余量状态的比值比(ORs)和95%CIs,均针对混杂因素进行了调整。在1818例患者中,有587例(32%)未接受新辅助治疗,而有1231例(68%)未接受新辅助治疗。新辅助治疗组的淋巴结产率较低(中位数为6比8;校正后的RR为0.75,0.73-0.78)。新辅助治疗后发现的转移性淋巴结更少(中位数为0对1;调整后的RR为0.76,0.69-0.84)。当调整除T期以外的混杂因素时,新辅助疗法可降低与肿瘤相关的切除切缘的风险(OR 0.52,0.38–0.70),但在调整T期(OR 0.91,0.64–1.29)后,这种关联并未保留。新辅助疗法似乎通过缩小原发性肿瘤降低了淋巴结的产生,并降低了肿瘤累及切除切缘的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号