首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases >Pre-Exposure Rabies Vaccination among US International Travelers: Findings from the Global TravEpiNet Consortium
【2h】

Pre-Exposure Rabies Vaccination among US International Travelers: Findings from the Global TravEpiNet Consortium

机译:美国国际旅行者的暴露前狂犬病疫苗接种:全球TravEpiNet联盟的发现

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: People who travel to areas with high rabies endemicity and have animal contact are at increased risk for rabies exposure. We examined characteristics of international travelers queried regarding rabies vaccination during pretravel consultations at Global TravEpiNet (GTEN) practices during 2009–2010.>Material and Methods: We performed bivariate and multivariable analyses of data collected from 18 GTEN clinics. Travel destinations were classified by strength level of rabies vaccination recommendation.>Results: Of 13,235 travelers, 226 (2%) reported previous rabies vaccination, and 406 (3%) received rabies vaccine at the consultation. Common travel purposes for these 406 travelers were leisure (26%), research/education (17%), and nonmedical service work (14%). Excluding the 226 who were previously vaccinated, 8070 (62%) of 13,009 travelers intended to visit one or more countries with a strong recommendation for rabies vaccination; 1675 (21%) of these 8070 intended to travel for 1 month or more. Among these 1675 travelers, 145 (9%) were vaccinated, 498 (30%) declined vaccination, 832 (50%) had itineraries that clinicians determined did not indicate vaccination, and 200 (12%) remained unvaccinated for other reasons. In both bivariate and multivariate analyses, travelers with trip durations >6 months versus 1–3 months (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=4.9 [95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1, 11.4]) and those traveling for “research/education” or to “provide medical care” (adjusted OR=5.1 [95% CI 1.9, 13.7] and 9.5 [95% CI 2.2, 40.8], respectively), compared with leisure travelers, were more likely to receive rabies vaccination.>Conclusions: Few travelers at GTEN clinics received rabies vaccine, although many planned trips 1 month long or more to a strong-recommendation country. Clinicians often determined that vaccine was not indicated, and travelers often declined vaccine when it was offered. The decision to vaccinate should take into account the strength of the vaccine recommendation at the destination country, duration of stay, availability of postexposure prophylaxis, potential for exposure to animals, and likelihood of recurrent travel to high-risk destinations.
机译:>背景:前往狂犬病流行率高的地区并与动物有接触的人患狂犬病的风险增加。我们在2009–2010年期间通过Global TravEpiNet(GTEN)进行旅行前咨询期间检查的有关狂犬病疫苗接种的国际旅行者的特征。>材料和方法:我们对从18个GTEN诊所收集的数据进行了双变量和多变量分析。 >结果:在13235名旅客中,有226名(2%)曾报告过狂犬病疫苗接种,有406名(3%)接受了狂犬病疫苗接种。这406位旅客的常见旅行目的是休闲(26%),研究/教育(17%)和非医疗服务工作(14%)。不包括先前曾接种过226疫苗的226人,在打算访问一个或多个国家强烈建议进行狂犬病疫苗接种的13,009名旅客中,有8070人(占62%);这些8070中有1675个(21%)打算旅行1个月或更长时间。在这1675名旅客中,有145名(9%)接种了疫苗,有498名(30%)拒绝了疫苗接种,有832名(50%)的行程被临床医生确定为未接种疫苗,还有200名(12%)出于其他原因未接种疫苗。在双变量和多变量分析中,旅行持续时间> 6个月比1-3个月的旅行者(调整后的优势比[OR] = 4.9 [95%置信区间[CI] 2.1,11.4])和进行“研究/教育”的旅行者或“提供医疗服务”(调整后的OR = 5.1 [95%CI 1.9,13.7]和9.5 [95%CI 2.2,40.8],与休闲旅行者相比,更可能接受狂犬病疫苗接种。>结论:尽管许多人计划在一个强烈推荐的国家进行1个月或更长时间的旅行,但很少有人在GTEN诊所接受狂犬病疫苗。临床医生通常确定没有使用疫苗,旅行者在提供疫苗时经常拒绝使用疫苗。接种疫苗的决定应考虑到目的地国家的疫苗推荐强度,住院时间,暴露后预防的有效性,接触动物的可能性以及反复前往高风险目的地的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号