首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Surgical Infections >Not Just Full of Hot Air: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Increases Survival in Cases of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections
【2h】

Not Just Full of Hot Air: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Increases Survival in Cases of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections

机译:不仅充满热空气:在坏死性软组织感染的情况下高压氧疗法可提高生存率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: The utility of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the treatment of necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) has not been proved. Previous studies have been subject to substantial selection bias because HBOT is not available universally at all medical centers, and there is often considerable delay associated with its initiation. We examined the utility of HBOT for the treatment of NSTI in the modern era by isolating centers that have their own HBOT facilities.>Methods: We queried all centers in the University Health Consortium (UHC) database from 2008 to 2010 that have their own HBOT facilities (n=14). Cases of NSTI were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes, which included Fournier gangrene (608.83), necrotizing fasciitis (728.86), and gas gangrene (040.0). Status of HBOT was identified by the presence (HBOT) or absence (control) of ICD-9 procedure code 93.95. Our cohort was risk-stratified and matched by UHC's validated severity of illness (SOI) score. Comparisons were then made using univariate tests of association and multivariable logistic regression.>Results: There were 1,583 NSTI cases at the 14 HBOT-capable centers. 117 (7%) cases were treated with HBOT. Univariate analysis showed that there was no difference between HBOT and control groups in hospital length of stay, direct cost, complications, and mortality across the three less severe SOI classes (minor, moderate, and major). However, for extreme SOI the HBOT group had fewer complications (45% vs. 66%; p<0.01) and fewer deaths (4% vs. 23%; p<0.01). Multivariable analysis showed that patients who did not receive HBOT were less likely to survive their index hospitalization (odds ratio, 10.6; 95% CI 5.2–25.1).>Conclusion: At HBOT-capable centers, receiving HBOT was associated with a significant survival benefit. Use of HBOT in conjunction with current practices for the treatment of NSTI can be both a cost-effective and life-saving therapy, in particular for the sickest patients.
机译:>背景:高压氧疗法(HBOT)在坏死性软组织感染(NSTIs)的治疗中尚未得到证实。先前的研究存在很大的选择偏倚,因为HBOT并非在所有医疗中心都可以普遍获得,并且开始使用HBOT通常会有相当大的延迟。我们通过隔离拥有自己的HBOT设施的中心来检查HBOT在现代NSTI治疗中的效用。>方法:我们从2008年至2007年的大学健康协会(UHC)数据库中查询了所有中心2010年拥有自己的HBOT设施(n = 14)。 NSTI的病例由国际疾病分类第九次修订(ICD-9)诊断代码确定,其中包括Fournier坏疽(608.83),坏死性筋膜炎(728.86)和气坏疽(040.0)。通过ICD-9程序代码93.95的存在(HBOT)或不存在(对照)来确定HBOT的状态。我们的队列被风险分层,并与UHC验证的疾病严重程度(SOI)评分相匹配。然后使用单变量关联检验和多变量logistic回归进行比较。>结果:在14个具有HBOT功能的中心,有1,583例NSTI病例。 HBOT治疗117例(7%)。单因素分析表明,在三个较不严重的SOI类别(次要,中度和主要)中,HBOT组和对照组在住院时间,直接费用,并发症和死亡率方面没有差异。但是,对于极端SOI,HBOT组的并发症更少(45%比66%; p <0.01),死亡更少(4%比23%; p <0.01)。多变量分析显示,未接受HBOT的患者在指数住院期间存活的可能性较小(优势比为10.6; 95%CI 5.2–25.1)。>结论:在有HBOT能力的中心,接受HBOT的患者与显着的生存效益相关。将HBOT与目前的实践相结合用于NSTI的治疗,既可以节省成本,又可以挽救生命,特别是对于最病的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号