首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Surgical Infections >Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Respiratory Pathogens in the Surgical/Trauma Intensive Care Unit Compared with the Hospital-Wide Respiratory Antibiogram in a Level I Trauma Center
【2h】

Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Respiratory Pathogens in the Surgical/Trauma Intensive Care Unit Compared with the Hospital-Wide Respiratory Antibiogram in a Level I Trauma Center

机译:外科/创伤重症监护病房中呼吸道病原体的抗菌敏感性与I级创伤中心医院全范围呼吸生物学图的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Unit-specific antibiograms have developed to guide clinicians to appropriate antibiotic choices for subsets of patients. The additional level of a unit- and respiratory-specific antibiogram for surgical and trauma patients defines key differences in susceptibility information for treating hospital-acquired pneumonia.>Methods: This was a three-year, retrospective single-center study. A total of 729 positive respiratory specimens from 612 patients were analyzed using Quality Compass Pathfinder, the antibiotic-reporting software. Culture and susceptibility reports were compared for the surgical/trauma intensive care unit (S/TICU) and the general hospital (excluding the S/TICU but including the medical ICU [MICU]). Data were filtered to include those genera and organisms with a high association with hospital-acquired pneumonia: Acinetobacter, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Escherichia coli, Haemophilus, Klebsiella, Neisseria, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Stenotrophomonas, Streptococcus, and Serratia.>Results: For gram-negative organisms, susceptibility differences were noted for Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas between the S/TICU and the rest of the hospital. In particular, Acinetobacter was significantly more susceptible to ciprofloxacin (86% vs. 43%; p<0.001), gentamicin (86% vs. 54%; p=0.001), imipenem-cilastatin (93% vs. 55%; p<0.001), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (88% vs. 54%; p=0.001), and tobramycin (50% vs. 0; p=0.012). Pseudomonas isolates from the S/TICU were significantly more susceptible to aztreonam (83% vs. 68%; p=0.037), ciprofloxacin (86% vs. 69%; p=0.019), and imipenem-cilastatin (94% vs. 79%; p=0.01). For gram-positive organisms, Staphylococcus isolates from the S/TICU were significantly more susceptible to erythromycin (81% vs. 57%; p=0.007) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (98% vs. 91%; p=0.034) than were the hospital isolates.>Conclusions: For key respiratory pathogens, such as Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and Staphylococcus, surgical and trauma patients present greater susceptibility to several antibiotics. Although this information cannot be extrapolated to other institutions, it does provide a basis for comparable institutions to consider developing unit- and collection-site-specific antibiograms for infections that affect surgical/trauma patients commonly.
机译:>背景:已开发出单位特异性抗菌素图,以指导临床医生为患者亚群选择合适的抗生素。针对外科和创伤患者的单位和呼吸系统特异性抗菌素的附加水平定义了在治疗医院获得性肺炎的敏感性信息中的关键差异。>方法:这是一个为期三年的回顾性单中心研究研究。使用Quality Compass Pathfinder (抗生素报告软件)对来自612位患者的729份阳性呼吸道标本进行了分析。比较了外科/创伤重症监护病房(S / TICU)和综合医院(不包括S / TICU但包括医疗ICU [MICU])的文化和药敏报告。筛选数据以包括与医院获得性肺炎高度相关的那些属和生物:不动杆菌,柠檬酸杆菌,肠杆菌,大肠杆菌,嗜血杆菌,克雷伯菌,奈瑟菌,假单胞菌,葡萄球菌,嗜麦芽单胞菌,链球菌和沙雷氏菌。>结果: 对于革兰氏阴性菌,注意到S / TICU与医院其他地方之间的不动杆菌和假单胞菌的药敏性差异。特别是,不动杆菌对环丙沙星(86%vs.43%; p <0.001),庆大霉素(86%vs.54%; p = 0.001),亚胺培南-西司他丁(93%vs.55%; p < 0.001),甲氧苄氨嘧啶-磺胺甲基恶唑(88%vs.54%; p = 0.001)和妥布霉素(50%vs.0; p = 0.012)。来自S / TICU的假单胞菌分离株对氨曲南的敏感度更高(83%vs. 68%; p = 0.037),环丙沙星(86%vs. 69%; p = 0.019)和亚胺培南-西司他丁(94%vs. 79) %; p = 0.01)。对于革兰氏阳性生物,来自S / TICU的葡萄球菌分离株对红霉素(81%比57%; p = 0.007)和甲氧苄氨磺胺甲基异恶唑(98%比91%; p = 0.034)的敏感性更高。 >结论:对于关键的呼吸道病原体,例如假单胞菌,不动杆菌和葡萄球菌,手术和创伤患者对几种抗生素的敏感性更高。尽管此信息不能外推到其他机构,但确实为可比较的机构考虑开发针对特定部位和收集部位的抗菌素谱提供了依据,以针对通常影响手术/创伤患者的感染。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号