首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Social History of Medicine >‘Where is the Fault?’: The Starvation of Edward Cooper at the Isle of Wight Workhouse in 1877
【2h】

‘Where is the Fault?’: The Starvation of Edward Cooper at the Isle of Wight Workhouse in 1877

机译:问题出在哪里?:1877年爱德华·库珀(Edward Cooper)在怀特岛(Isle)怀特岛(W岛)的饥饿

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Edward Cooper was a disabled pauper who died of starvation in a workhouse ‘idiot’ ward. His neglect was the result of systemic problems, exacerbated by policy, and the poor law's free market approach to employing doctors in this period. In the 1870s community care came under assault from a policy that is known to historians as the ‘crusade against outdoor relief’. Though it sought to target ‘idlers’ and ‘undeserving’ cases, the withdrawal of vital payments for familial carers drove up the number of institutionalised and vulnerable patients. In turn, workhouse medical officers and nurses were unprepared for disabled patients, such as Edward, and charges of negligence increased. This article will provide a rare and detailed comparison between Victorian workhouse care and care in the community, drawn from extant contemporary affidavits.
机译:爱德华·库珀(Edward Cooper)是一位残疾贫民,在工作场所的“白痴”病房中死于饥饿。他的疏忽是系统问题的结果,政策加剧了这一问题,并且在此期间,法律的自由市场采用了雇用医生的自由市场方法。在1870年代,社区护理受到历史学家称为“反对户外救济十字军”的政策的袭击。尽管它试图针对“无助者”和“无用者”病例,但撤回对家庭照料者的重要报酬却增加了住院患者和弱势患者的数量。反过来,车间的医务人员和护士没有为残疾患者(如爱德华)做好准备,过失的指控也增加了。本文将根据现存的现代宣誓书,对维多利亚时代的工作场所护理与社区护理之间进行罕见而详细的比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号