首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >The impact of RHDV-K5 on rabbit populations in Australia: an evaluation of citizen science surveys to monitor rabbit abundance
【2h】

The impact of RHDV-K5 on rabbit populations in Australia: an evaluation of citizen science surveys to monitor rabbit abundance

机译:RHDV-K5对澳大利亚兔种群的影响:一项用于监测兔丰度的公民科学调查的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The increasing popularity of citizen science in ecological research has created opportunities for data collection from large teams of observers that are widely dispersed. We established a citizen science program to complement the release of a new variant of the rabbit biological control agent, rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV), known colloquially as K5, across Australia. We evaluated the impact of K5 on the national rabbit population and compared citizen science and professionally-collected spotlight count data. Of the citizen science sites (n = 219), 93% indicated a decrease in rabbit abundance following the release of K5. The overall finite monthly growth rate in rabbit abundance was estimated as 0.66 (95%CI, 0.26, 1.03), averaging a monthly reduction of 34% at the citizen science sites one month after the release. No such declines were observed at the professionally monitored sites (n = 22). The citizen science data submissions may have been unconsciously biased or the number of professional sites may have been insufficient to detect a change. Citizen science participation also declined by 56% over the post-release period. Future programs should ensure the use of blinded trials to check for unconscious bias and consider how incentives and/or the good will of the participants can be maintained throughout the program.
机译:公民科学在生态研究中的日益普及为从分散的大型观察员团队收集数据创造了机会。我们建立了一项公民科学计划,以补充在整个澳大利亚发行的兔生物防治剂兔出血性疾病病毒(RHDV)的新变种​​,俗称K5。我们评估了K5对国家兔子种群的影响,并比较了公民科学和专业收集的聚光灯计数数据。在公民科学站点(n = 219)中,有93%的人表示K5释放后兔子的丰度下降。兔子丰度的整体有限月度增长率估计为0.66(95%CI,0.26、1.03),平均释放后一个月在市民科学站点每月减少34%。在专业监测地点没有观察到这种下降(n = 22)。公民科学数据提交可能不自觉地存在偏见,或者专业站点的数量可能不足以检测到更改。在发布后的时期内,公民科学参与度也下降了56%。未来的计划应确保使用盲法试验来检查无意识的偏见,并考虑在整个计划中如何保持参与者的激励和/或善意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号