首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oncology Letters >Nedaplatin-based chemotherapy regimens combined with concurrent radiotherapy as first-line treatment for stage II–III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
【2h】

Nedaplatin-based chemotherapy regimens combined with concurrent radiotherapy as first-line treatment for stage II–III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

机译:基于奈达铂的化疗方案与同期放疗相结合成为II-III期食管鳞状细胞癌的一线治疗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is an effective first-line treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The present study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between three nedaplatin-based regimens for CCRT of ESCC. Patients with stage II–III thoracic ESCC in China between January 2012 and May 2016 were included. Patients received esophageal ultrasonography prior to treatment. Chemotherapy was as follows: i) 100 mg/m2 nedaplatin intravenously on day 1 and 70 mg/m2 tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium (S-1) orally twice daily for 2 weeks; ii) 50 mg/m2 nedaplatin intravenously on days 1 and 2 and 35 mg/m2 docetaxel intravenously on days 1 and 8; or iii) 60 mg/m2 nedaplatin intravenously on days 1 and 2. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was used to administer a total dose of 60–66 Gy (1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction) to the primary tumor and 45–50 Gy to the subclinical region. A total of 70 patients were enrolled (median age, 66 years; range, 50–81 years). T4 disease was identified in 45 (64.3%) patients. All patients completed radiotherapy and received ≥2 chemotherapy cycles. Estimated 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 82.9, 53.9 and 31.4%, respectively. OS and progression-free survival were similar between the three treatment groups. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were observed in 35 (50%) patients. The incidence of serious treatment-associated toxicities was numerically highest for the nedaplatin/docetaxel combination. Patients with thoracic ESCC had good clinical outcomes following CCRT. With similar survival rates and disease responses yet lower hematological toxicities, nedaplatin/S-1 and single-agent nedaplatin may be preferable to nedaplatin/docetaxel. Poor control of distant metastasis may be a disadvantage of single-agent chemotherapy use in CCRT, and a further study with larger cohorts is required to confirm this.
机译:同期放化疗(CCRT)是食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的有效一线治疗。本研究旨在比较ESCC CCRT的三种基于奈达铂的治疗方案之间的临床结局。纳入2012年1月至2016年5月在中国发生II-III期胸膜ESCC的患者。患者在治疗前接受了食管超声检查。化疗方法如下:i)第1天静脉给予100 mg / m 2 奈达铂和70 mg / m 2 替加福-吉美拉西-奥曲拉钾(S-1)口服两次每天2周; ii)第1天和第2天静脉注射50 mg / m 2 奈达铂,第1天和第8天静脉注射35 mg / m 2 多西他赛;或iii)在第1天和第2天静脉内使用60 mg / m 2 奈达铂静脉注射。调强放疗的总剂量为60-66 Gy(每级分1.8-2.0 Gy)肿瘤和亚临床区域的45-50 Gy。共有70例患者入组(中位年龄66岁;范围50-81岁)。在45(64.3%)位患者中发现了T4疾病。所有患者均完成了放疗并接受了≥2个化疗周期。估计的1年,2年和3年总生存率分别为82.9%,53.9%和31.4%。三个治疗组之间的OS和无进展生存期相似。在35名(50%)患者中观察到3/4级血液学毒性。奈达铂/多西他赛组合的严重治疗相关毒性的发生率在数值上最高。 CCRT后,胸部ESCC患者的临床预后良好。由于生存率和疾病反应相似,但血液毒性较低,因此奈达铂/ S-1和单药奈达铂可能优于奈达铂/多西他赛。对远处转移的不良控制可能是CCRT中使用单药化疗的一个缺点,需要进一步的大规模研究来证实这一点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号