首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Palliative Medicine >Utility of the Surprise Question in Predicting Survival among Older Patients with Acute Surgical Conditions
【2h】

Utility of the Surprise Question in Predicting Survival among Older Patients with Acute Surgical Conditions

机译:惊奇问题在预测急性外科疾病老年患者存活率中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: The surprise question is a validated tool for identifying patients with increased risk of death within one year who could, therefore, benefit from palliative care. However, its utility in surgery is unknown.>Objective: We sought to determine whether the surprise question predicted 12-month mortality in older emergency general surgery patients.>Design: This was a prospective cohort study.>Setting/Subjects: Emergency general surgery attendings and surgical residents in or beyond their third year of training at a single tertiary care academic hospital from January to July 2014.>Measurements: Surgeons responded to the surprise question within 72 hours of evaluating patients, ≥65 years, hospitalized with an acute surgical condition. Patient data, including demographic and clinical characteristics, were extracted from the medical record. Mortality within 12 months of initial evaluation was determined by using Social Security death data.>Results: Ten attending surgeons and 18 surgical residents provided 163 responses to the surprise question for 119 patients: 60% of responses were “No, I would not be surprised” and 40% were “Yes, I would be surprised.” A “No” response was associated with increased odds of death within 12 months in binary logistic regression (OR 4.8 [95% CI 2.1–11.1]).>Conclusions: The surprise question is a valuable tool for identifying older patients with higher risk of death, and it may be a useful screening criterion for older emergency general surgery patients who would benefit from palliative care evaluation.
机译:>背景:令人惊讶的问题是一种经过验证的工具,可用于识别一年内死亡风险增加的患者,这些患者因此可以从姑息治疗中受益。但是,它在外科手术中的用途尚不清楚。>目的:我们试图确定这一意外问题是否可以预测老年急诊普外科手术患者的12个月死亡率。>设计:前瞻性队列研究。>设置/受试者: 2014年1月至2014年7月在一家三级护理学术医院接受急诊普通外科手术的患者以及外科医师在其第三年或以后的培训。>措施:外科医生在对≥65岁并接受急性外科手术治疗的患者进行评估后的72小时内回答了这一突击问题。从医疗记录中提取了包括人口统计学和临床​​特征在内的患者数据。使用社会保障死亡数据确定了初始评估后12个月内的死亡率。>结果:十名主治医师和18名外科住院医师为119名患者提供了163个针对意外问题的回答:60%的回答为“否” ,我不会感到惊讶”,而40%是“是的,我会感到惊讶”。在二元逻辑回归中,“否”响应与12个月内死亡几率增加相关(OR 4.8 [95%CI 2.1-11.1])。>结论:突击问题是识别以下疾病的有价值的工具具有较高死亡风险的老年患者,这对于从姑息治疗评估中受益的老年急诊普外科患者可能是有用的筛查标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号