首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Palliative Medicine >The Use of a Brief 5-Item Measure of Family Satisfaction as a Critical Quality Indicator in Advanced Cancer Care: A Multisite Comparison
【2h】

The Use of a Brief 5-Item Measure of Family Satisfaction as a Critical Quality Indicator in Advanced Cancer Care: A Multisite Comparison

机译:简短的5项家庭满意度测算作为晚期癌症护理中关键质量指标的使用:多点比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Although family satisfaction is recognized as a critical indicator of quality for patients with advanced cancer, it is rarely assessed as part of routine clinical care. Measurement burden may be one barrier to widespread use of family satisfaction measures.>Objective: The goal of this study was to test the ability of a new, brief 5-item measure of family satisfaction with care to accurately capture differences across hospital settings.>Design: Using data from the Palliative Care for Cancer Patients study, a prospective study of 1979 patients and caregivers, we used multivariate regression analysis to detect significant differences across five sites.>Settings: Hospitalized patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers>Methods: We used both the shortened 5-item version of the FAMCARE scale (previously developed using Item Response Theory) and the original 20-item FAMCARE to measure family satisfaction.>Results: On the 5-item FAMCARE, sites ranged from mean scores of 5.5–6.9 out of a possible high score of 10. Family members at one care site (n = 783) were significantly (p < 0.05) less satisfied with their care than family members at four other care sites. The original 20-item measure failed to differentiate satisfaction levels between all hospital sites.>Discussion: Variability in family satisfaction with advanced cancer care across hospital settings can be more sensitively detected using a brief 5-item questionnaire versus longer measures. The development of less lengthy and burdensome measures for monitoring family satisfaction, which are still valid, can facilitate routine assessments to maintain and promote high-quality care across care settings.
机译:>背景:尽管家庭满意度被认为是晚期癌症患者质量的关键指标,但很少将其作为常规临床护理的一部分。衡量负担可能是广泛使用家庭满意度衡量指标的一个障碍。>目的:本研究的目的是测试一种新的简短的5项家庭满意度衡量指标,并能准确地捕获其能力>设计:使用来自癌症患者姑息治疗研究的数据(一项对1979年患者和护理人员的前瞻性研究),我们使用多元回归分析来检测五个部位的显着差异。>设置:住院的晚期癌症患者及其护理人员>方法:我们同时使用了FAMCARE量表的缩短的5个项目版本(以前使用项目反应理论开发)和原始的20个项目FAMCARE用来衡量家庭满意度。>结果:在FAMCARE的5个项目中,各站点的平均得分范围为5.5–6.9,满分为10。该家庭成员在一个关怀站点的平均得分为(n = 783) )明显(p <0.05)对他们的护理的满意度低于其他四个护理地点的家庭成员。最初的20项指标未能区分所有医院地点之间的满意度。>讨论:使用简短的5项问卷调查可以更敏感地检测出医院范围内高级癌症护理的家庭满意度差异,而更长的问卷调查则更长。措施。制定减少家庭负担的冗长而繁琐的措施仍然有效,这可以促进常规评估,以维持和促进各种医疗机构提供高质量的医疗服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号