首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Palliative Medicine >Surgeons Perspectives on Avoiding Nonbeneficial Treatments in Seriously Ill Older Patients with Surgical Emergencies: A Qualitative Study
【2h】

Surgeons Perspectives on Avoiding Nonbeneficial Treatments in Seriously Ill Older Patients with Surgical Emergencies: A Qualitative Study

机译:外科医生对于重症手术紧急重症患者避免非有益治疗的观点:定性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Clinical decisions for seriously ill older patients with surgical emergencies are highly complex. Measuring the benefits of burdensome treatments in this context is fraught with uncertainty. Little is known about how surgeons formulate treatment decisions to avoid nonbeneficial surgery, or engage in preoperative conversations about end-of-life (EOL) care.>Objective: We sought to describe how surgeons approach such discussions, and to identify modifiable factors to reduce nonbeneficial surgery near the EOL.>Design: Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit a national sample of emergency general surgeons. Semistructured interviews were conducted between February and May 2014.>Measurements: Three independent coders performed qualitative coding using NVivo software (NVivo version 10.0, QSR International). Content analysis was used to identify factors important to surgical decision making and EOL communication.>Results: Twenty-four surgeons were interviewed. Participants felt responsible for conducting EOL conversations with seriously ill older patients and their families before surgery to prevent nonbeneficial treatments. However, wide differences in prognostic estimates among surgeons, inadequate data about postoperative quality of life (QOL), patients and surrogates who were unprepared for EOL conversations, variation in perceptions about the role of palliative care, and time constraints are contributors to surgeons providing nonbeneficial operations. Surgeons reported performing operations they knew would not benefit the patient to give the family time to come to terms with the patient's demise.>Conclusions: Emergency general surgeons feel responsible for having preoperative discussions about EOL care with seriously ill older patients to avoid nonbenefical surgery. However, surgeons identified multiple factors that undermine adequate communication and lead to nonbeneficial surgery.
机译:>背景:对于患有外科急症的重症老年患者的临床决策非常复杂。在这种情况下,衡量繁重治疗的益处充满不确定性。关于外科医生如何制定治疗决策以避免无益手术或进行有关生命终止(EOL)护理的术前对话知之甚少。>目的:我们试图描述外科医生如何进行此类讨论,以及以确定减少EOL附近非受益性手术的可修改因素。>设计:目的和滚雪球采样用于收集全国急诊外科医生样本。在2014年2月至5月之间进行了半结构化访谈。>测量结果::三个独立的编码人员使用NVivo软件(NVivo版本10.0,QSR International)进行了定性编码。内容分析被用来识别对手术决策和EOL沟通重要的因素。>结果:采访了二十四名外科医生。参加者感到有责任在手术前与重病的老年患者及其家人进行EOL对话,以防止非有益的治疗。但是,外科医生之间的预后估计差异很大,有关术后生活质量(QOL)的数据不足,对EOL对话没有做好准备的患者和代孕者,对姑息治疗作用的认识不同,以及时间限制是外科医生提供非受益性治疗的原因操作。外科医生报告说,他们执行已知的手术对患者的病情没有好处,无法给患者家庭带来康复的机会。>结论:急诊普通外科医师对在术前讨论重症老年人的EOL护理感到有责任患者要避免非手术治疗。但是,外科医生发现了多种因素,这些因素破坏了适当的沟通并导致了无益手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号