首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology >Accuracy of the Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease at National Institute on Aging Alzheimers Disease Centers 2005–2010
【2h】

Accuracy of the Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease at National Institute on Aging Alzheimers Disease Centers 2005–2010

机译:美国国立老年痴呆症研究中心的老年痴呆症临床诊断准确性2005–2010

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The neuropathological examination is considered to provide the gold standard for Alzheimer disease (AD). To determine the accuracy of currently employed clinical diagnostic methods, clinical and neuropathological data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC), which gathers information from the network of National Institute on Aging (NIA)-sponsored Alzheimer's Disease Centers (ADCs), were collected as part of the NACC Uniform Data Set (UDS) between 2005 and 2010. A database search initially included all 1198 subjects with at least one UDS clinical assessment and who had died and been autopsied; 279 were excluded as being not demented or because critical data fields were missing. The final subject number was 919. Sensitivity and specificity were determined based on “probable” and “possible” AD levels of clinical confidence and 4 levels of neuropathological confidence based on varying neuritic plaque densities and Braak neurofibrillary stages. Sensitivity ranged from 70.9% to 87.3%; specificity ranged from 44.3% to 70.8%. Sensitivity was generally increased with more permissive clinical criteria and specificity was increased with more restrictive criteria, whereas the opposite was true for neuropathological criteria. When a clinical diagnosis was not confirmed by minimum levels of AD histopathology, the most frequent primary neuropathological diagnoses were tangle-only dementia or argyrophilic grain disease, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, cerebrovascular disease, Lewy body disease and hippocampal sclerosis. When dementia was not clinically diagnosed as AD, 39% of these cases met or exceeded minimum threshold levels of AD histopathology. Neurologists of the NIA-ADCs had higher predictive accuracy when they diagnosed AD in demented subjects than when they diagnosed dementing diseases other than AD. The misdiagnosis rate should be considered when estimating subject numbers for AD studies, including clinical trials and epidemiological studies.
机译:神经病理学检查被认为为阿尔茨海默病(AD)提供了金标准。为了确定当前采用的临床诊断方法的准确性,收集了国家阿尔茨海默氏症协调中心(NACC)的临床和神经病理学数据,该数据收集了美国国家老龄研究所(NIA)赞助的阿尔茨海默氏病中心(ADC)网络的信息作为2005年至2010年间NACC统一数据集(UDS)的一部分。数据库搜索最初包括所有1198名经过至少一项UDS临床评估且已死亡并被尸检的受试者; 279个未取消注释或因为缺少关键数据字段而被排除在外。最终的受试者编号为919。敏感性和特异性是根据临床信心的“可能”和“可能” AD水平以及神经病斑密度和Braak神经原纤维分期的不同而确定的4级神经病理学信心。灵敏度范围从70.9%到87.3%;特异性范围为44.3%至70.8%。一般而言,在允许的临床标准较高的情况下,敏感性会增加,而在限制性较高的标准中,特异性会增加,而神经病理学标准则相反。当最低限度的AD组织病理学检查未证实临床诊断时,最常见的原发性神经病理学诊断为仅缠结性痴呆或嗜银粒病,额颞叶变性,脑血管疾病,路易体病和海马硬化。当痴呆症未被临床诊断为AD时,这些病例中有39%达到或超过了AD组织病理学的最低阈值水平。 NIA-ADC的神经学家在诊断患有痴呆症的受试者中诊断出AD时比诊断出患有AD以外的其他痴呆性疾病时具有更高的预测准确性。在评估包括临床试验和流行病学研究在内的AD研究的受试者人数时,应考虑误诊率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号