首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA >Take Note(s): Differential EHR Satisfaction with Two Implementations under One Roof
【2h】

Take Note(s): Differential EHR Satisfaction with Two Implementations under One Roof

机译:请注意:在一个屋檐下有两种实现方式的差异化EHR满意度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: The aim of this study was to rigorously evaluate perceived differences in satisfaction with an electronic health record (EHR) between residents of two medical specialties who share the same health record, practice location, administration, and information technology support.>Design: A cross-sectional survey was used comparing user satisfaction between pediatrics residents and internal medicine residents in an academic practice.>Measurements: The survey was designed to measure baseline demographic characteristics, attitudes toward computers, general satisfaction with an EHR, and perceived practicality of use, variation from familiar practice, organizational support, and impact on delivery of care.>Results: Medicine subjects were similar to pediatrics subjects in baseline demographic characteristics. Satisfaction with the EHR implementation was very high for both sets of subjects, but internal medicine residents were significantly less likely to be satisfied with the EHR implementation (relative risk [RR] = 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.73–0.98) and considerably less likely to believe that their colleagues were satisfied with it (RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.41–0.77). The only surveyed characteristic independently predicting satisfaction was medical specialty (p = 0.04). Medicine subjects were less likely to believe template-based documentation improved their efficiency (RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.46–0.88). They were significantly more likely to believe the system had been designed to improve billing (RR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.05–2.04) and not to improve patient care (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.44–0.85).>Conclusion: The authors found a difference in satisfaction between internal medicine and pediatrics users of an EHR. Although many potential factors that influence satisfaction were similar between subjects in the two specialties, differences in previous experience may have influenced the results. Medicine residents had more previous experience with a different EHR implementation, which they may have perceived as superior to the one involved in this study. Pediatric residents had more previous experience with structured data entry prior to EHR implementation and more preventive care patient encounters for which structured data entry may be well suited. Since successful implementations generally require satisfied users, understanding what factors affect satisfaction can improve chances of a system's success.
机译:>目的:本研究的目的是严格评估两个拥有相同健康记录,执业地点,行政管理和信息的医学专科居民对电子健康记录(EHR)满意度的感知差异技术支持。>设计:采用横断面调查,在学术实践中比较了儿科住院医师和内科住院医师之间的用户满意度。>测量:该调查旨在测量基线人口统计学特征,对计算机的态度,对电子病历的总体满意度以及使用的感知实用性,与习惯做法,组织支持的差异以及对护理提供的影响。>结果:医学科目与儿科科目相似基线人口特征。两组受试者对EHR实施的满意度都很高,但是内科住院医师对EHR实施的满意度大大降低(相对风险[RR] = 0.84,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.73-0.98)并不太可能相信他们的同事对此感到满意(RR = 0.56,95%CI = 0.41-0.77)。唯一可以独立预测满意度的调查特征是医学专业(p = 0.04)。医学对象不太可能相信基于模板的文档可以提高其效率(RR = 0.64,95%CI = 0.46-0.88)。他们更有可能认为该系统旨在改善计费(RR = 1.50,95%CI = 1.05-2.04)而不是改善患者护理(RR = 0.61,95%CI = 0.44-0.85)。 >结论:作者发现内科医师和EHR的儿科使用者之间的满意度存在差异。尽管在两个专业中,影响满意度的许多潜在因素在两个专业之间是相似的,但是先前经验的差异可能会影响结果。医学居民以前有过不同的EHR实施经验,他们可能认为这优于本研究中涉及的经验。在实施EHR之前,儿科住院医师具有更多的结构化数据输入经验,而预防性的患者接触更适合结构化数据输入。由于成功的实现通常需要满意的用户,因此了解影响满意度的因素可以提高系统成功的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号