首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Medicine and Life >Home-based versus center-based care in children with cerebral palsy: a cost-effectiveness analysis
【2h】

Home-based versus center-based care in children with cerebral palsy: a cost-effectiveness analysis

机译:儿童的家庭护理与中心护理脑性瘫痪的成本效益分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The rehabilitation services for children with cerebral palsy are provided in two forms: home-based care and center-based care. The aim of this research was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the home-based accordance with the center-based care for kids with cerebral palsy.In this cost-effectiveness research, 56 children under 12 years old were assigned randomly to two rehabilitation programs: (1) clinic-based rehabilitation services (CBRS); and (2) home-based rehabilitation services (HBRS). Data were collected by two questionnaires: a strong life quality survey of children with cerebral palsy (CP QOL-Child) and medical and non-medical costs’ checklists. Finally, the incremental expense-efficacy rate (ICER) was used to determine the further expenses of one unit of the quality of life gained by CBRS compared with HBRS. The mean costs per patients for the home-based care group were less than the ones for the clinic-based care unit (US$ 660.3 vs. US$ 933.8). The costs of the rehabilitation services and transportation were the main costs in the two patients’ groups. The quality of life for cases in the home-based care group was better than the one of the clinic-based care team. The results showed that the home-based care method was more cost-effective than the centre-based care approach in children with cerebral palsy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated at about US$ 2.6.The conclusion was that home-based care centers were more cost-effective than the centre-based care centers for children with cerebral palsy. Therefore, it was suggested that the health policy makers pay more attention to developing home-based care strategy in physically challenged children.
机译:为脑瘫儿童提供的康复服务有两种形式:家庭护理和中心护理。这项研究的目的是评估以家庭为基础的脑瘫患儿的中心护理的成本效益。在这项成本效益研究中,将56名12岁以下的儿童随机分配到两个康复计划中:(1)基于诊所的康复服务(CBRS); (2)家庭康复服务(HBRS)。数据是通过两个调查表收集的:对脑瘫患儿(CP QOL-Child)进行的强有力的生活质量调查以及医疗和非医疗费用的清单。最后,使用增量费用效率率(ICER)来确定与HBRS相比,CBRS获得的一个生活质量单位的进一步费用。家庭护理组每位患者的平均费用低于诊所护理组(660.3美元对933.8美元)。康复服务和运输的费用是这两个患者组的主要费用。家庭护理组患者的生活质量优于诊所护理组之一。结果表明,对于脑瘫患儿,家庭护理方式比中心护理方式更具成本效益。计算得出的增量成本效益比约为2.6美元。结论是,家庭护理中心比脑瘫儿童中心护理中心更具成本效益。因此,有人建议卫生政策制定者应更加注意为身体有障碍的儿童制定家庭护理策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号